March 24 – Global air travel remains severely disrupted, with many people still unable to fly as planned to destinations after the Iran war forced the closure of major Middle Eastern hubs, including Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi.. Airlines cancel more flights as Middle East conflict escalates. Below is the latest on flights, in alphabetical order:. AEGEAN AIRLINES. Greece’s largest carrier has cancelled flights to Tel Aviv, Beirut and Amman until April 22, and to Erbil and Baghdad until May 24. Flights to Dubai have been cancelled until April 19 and to Riyadh until April 18.. AIRBALTIC. Latvia’s airBaltic said all flights to Tel Aviv had been cancelled until April 29. All flights to Dubai stand cancelled until October 24.. AIR CANADA. The Canadian carrier has cancelled all flights to Tel Aviv until May 2 and to Dubai until March 28.. AIR EUROPA. The Spanish airline has cancelled all flights to Tel Aviv until April 10.. AIR FRANCE KLM. Air France has cancelled Tel Aviv and Beirut flights until March 28 and Dubai and Riyadh flights until March 24, as well as a March 25 departure from Dubai.. KLM suspended flights to Riyadh, Dammam and Dubai until May 17 and to Tel Aviv until April 11.. CATHAY PACIFIC. The Hong Kong airline has cancelled all passenger flights to Dubai and Riyadh until May 31. To cater to a surge in demand to Europe, it will operate three additional return flights to Paris and Zurich, and will provide additional seats on 13 existing flights to London in April.. DELTA. The U.S. carrier has cancelled its New York-Tel Aviv flights until May 31 and Tel Aviv-New York flights until June 1. The restart of its Atlanta-Tel Aviv route has been delayed, with flights to Tel Aviv paused until August 4 and from Tel Aviv until August 5.. EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES. The Israeli carrier said operational constraints are preventing regular flights from Israel, except in rare, exceptional cases, and that it is continuing efforts to bring passengers home. The airline has also urged authorities to open Ramon Airport near Eilat.. EMIRATES. The UAE airline said it was operating a reduced flight schedule following a partial reopening of regional airspace.. ETIHAD AIRWAYS. The UAE carrier said it was operating a limited commercial flight schedule between Abu Dhabi and select destinations.. FINNAIR. The Finnish carrier has cancelled its Dubai flights until March 29 and Doha flights until July 2, while continuing to avoid the airspace of Iraq, Iran, Syria and Israel.. FLYNAS. Saudi budget airline Flynas has extended its suspension of flights to Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Doha, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq and Syria until March 31.. IAG. IAG-owned British Airways has extended cancellations of flights to Amman, Bahrain, Dubai and Tel Aviv until May 31 and to Doha until April 30, while adding flights to Bangkok and Singapore. Flights to Abu Dhabi remain suspended until later this year.. INDIGO. The Indian airline has suspended operations to Doha, Kuwait, Bahrain, Dammam, Fujairah 

 The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that conversion to Christianity and other religions results in the loss of Scheduled Caste (SC) status, holding that a person who professes a faith other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot claim the constitutional protections available to members of SC.. The court said once an individual voluntarily converts and actively practices another faith, the legal entitlements tied to SC identity, including protection under the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, cease to apply. (HT PHOTO). Upholding an Andhra Pradesh high court judgment, the bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan said once an individual voluntarily converts and actively practices another faith, the legal entitlements tied to SC identity, including protection under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, cease to apply.. It endorsed the high court’s reasoning that the constitutional scheme under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, restricts the SC status to specified religions, and that conversion beyond this framework automatically disqualifies a person from claiming such status. The court underscored that the determinative factor is the religion professed at the time of the incident, not merely the existence of a caste certificate.. The ruling arose from a case involving a pastor from Andhra Pradesh who invoked the SC/ST Act, alleging assault and caste-based abuse by certain individuals in his village. The accused challenged the proceedings on the ground that the complainant, Chinthada Anand, had converted to Christianity and was actively functioning as a pastor, thereby disentitling him from invoking protections meant exclusively for the SC.. The Supreme Court noted that the facts on record left little room for doubt. The petitioner had not claimed any reconversion to his original faith nor any re-acceptance into his caste community. On the contrary, evidence showed that he had been practising Christianity for over a decade and regularly conducting prayer meetings as a pastor. The bench observed that these “concurrent facts” clearly established that he continued to profess Christianity at the time of the alleged incident, making him ineligible for the SC status and the protections flowing from it.. The decision effectively endorses the Andhra Pradesh high court’s April 30, 2025, ruling delivered by Justice N Harinath, which had quashed the criminal proceedings initiated under the SC/ST Act. The high court held that the caste system is alien to Christianity and that a person who has voluntarily converted cannot seek the benefit of a law designed to address caste-based discrimination within the Hindu social structure and its legally recognised extensions.. The high court rejected the argument that the continued possession of a caste certificate entitled the complainant to protection under the SC/ST Act. It clarified that the validity or cancellation of such a certificate 

 Delhi Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta on Tuesday received a bomb threat e-mail that warned that the House and the Vidhan Sabha metro station would be “blown up”.. Delhi cabinet ministers during the Delhi Assembly Budget Session 2026 at the Vidhan Sabha in New Delhi. (Hindustan Times/File). The threat sparked inspection at the Delhi Assembly premises, videos accessed by HT showed. However, nothing suspicious has been found in the searches so far and necessary police arrangements are in place.. According to news agency ANI, the mail also contained threats to Lt Governor Taranjit Singh Sandhu, PM Modi, HM Amit Shah, EAM Dr S Jaishankar, Delhi CM Rekha Gupta and Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa. However, HT couldn’t confirm the veracity of this information.. The e-mail is the latest in a series of such bomb threats received in Delhi over the past few months, especially to schools.. Earlier this month, at least three banks and six schools in the city received bomb threat emails. Among the banks that received the threats were the Axis Bank branch in Connaught Place, State Bank of India AIIMS Branch and the SBI in east Delhi’s Shahdara, news agency PTI had reported.. The six schools that reportedly received similar threat emails included Army Public School in Delhi Cantt, Salwan Public School, Sardar Patel Vidyalaya, Mira Public School in Janakpuri, Ramjas Public School and Ramjas School in Rajendra Nagar.. The threat had sparked an evacuation at schools but nothing suspicious was found upon inspection. 

 The Election Commission found itself at the centre of a political controversy on Monday after a letter from the poll body bearing the BJP Kerala unit’s seal went viral.. Reacting to the development, the Election Commission said it was “purely a clerical error” and had been “rectified immediately.” (X/ CPI(M)). The CPI(M) raised the issue on the social media platform X, sharing an affidavit attached to a March 19, 2019 letter sent to political parties across the country, which bore the BJP Kerala seal instead of the official seal of the Election Commission. Later, the Congress also reacted sharply to the letter.. However, the Election Commission downplayed it as a “clerical error”.. Reacting to the development, the Election Commission said that the seal on the letter was “purely a clerical error” and had been “rectified immediately.”. “It has come to our notice that a letter from the Election Commission, bearing the seal of the BJP, is being circulated across various Malayalam news channels. The Office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) hereby clarifies that this was purely a clerical error, which was identified and rectified immediately,” a post by Kerala Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) on X read.. Explaining the sequence of events, the CEO’s office said, “The BJP Kerala Unit had recently approached the CEO’s office seeking clarification on the 2019 guidelines regarding the publication of criminal antecedents of candidates. Along with their request, the party submitted a photocopy of the original 2019 directive. The party’s seal was present on that specific copy provided by them.”. It added, “Due to an oversight, the office failed to notice the party symbol on the submitted document and inadvertently redistributed it to other political parties as part of the requested clarification.”. The CEO’s office said corrective action was taken promptly.. “The Office of the Chief Electoral Officer acknowledged the lapse as soon as it was detected. Consequently, on March 21, the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer issued a formal letter withdrawing the erroneous document,” it said.. “The withdrawal notice was dispatched to all political parties, District Election Officers, and Returning Officers,” the statement added.. Urging restraint, the CEO’s office said, “The public and media are requested to refrain from spreading misleading messages based on this clerical error. The Election Commission maintains a rigorous and foolproof system to ensure that the electoral process remains free from any external interference or influence.”. Reactions from the Opposition. Earlier, in a strongly worded post, the CPI(M) said, “Have all pretences been dropped by the BJP?”. It added, “It is no secret that the same power centre seems to control both the Election Commission of India and the BJP. Even then, at least maintain the courtesy of two separate desks.”. The CPI(M) later reacted to the EC’s clarification, saying that it wasn’t an error but “a warning”.. “Cler 

 The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the functioning of its registry regarding the listing of a public interest litigation (PIL) for hearing over a year after it was last heard in February last year.. The matter was ordered to be listed for hearing in March last year. (HT PHOTO). “Something so fishy is going on in this court,” said a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, as it heard the PIL on foreign credit companies collecting and storing confidential financial data of consumers without obtaining their consent. “The registrar (judicial) is directed to file a report as to why the matter was not listed after February 2025.” The matter will be heard next on April 10.. The matter was ordered to be listed for hearing in March 17 last year.. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Union government, on Monday said that the matter required an elaborate hearing as the home ministry had submitted its response to the PIL pending since 2024.. Senior advocate K Parmeshwar, who assisted the court as amicus curiae, submitted a note based on the government’s response. The court asked Parmeshwar to share his note with Mehta and granted two weeks for the government to file a response.. The petition named four foreign companies and accused them of collecting and processing confidential and sensitive financial data of consumers. It referred to five Indian companies and sought directions for them to protect data privacy and secure financial information.. The petitioner, Surya Prakash, said the actions of the companies are prohibited under the Credit Information Companies Regulation Act, 2005. He said the foreign companies collect and store the data in their servers located outside India in violation of the data localisation principle without the knowledge of individuals and companies, who avail their services.