By Dickens OleweBBC NewsUganda, Tanzania will begin construction on a massive crude oil line. This is one year after the International Energy Agency warned the world that new fossil fuel projects could lead to the world not meeting its climate goals. The priority of the two East African countries is economic development. Juma Hamisi, who is not his real name, keeps his distance and avoids trespassing as he points out mounds of rubble scattered across an open field. These are signs that once a thriving community lived here in a mix concrete and grass-thatched, mud houses. It too is bare. “We used to be the main source of lemons and cassava, but now there is scarcity. Mr Hamisi states that we can’t even harvest coconuts from there, as it’s not our land anymore. Many signs bearing the name Tanzania Petroleum Development Cooperation (a state agency) claim ownership of the land where once lived, farmed, and played. This was after the government entered into a contract to build a pipeline to transport crude oil from Lake Albert in western Uganda. The construction of the 1,440km (895 mile) pipeline will begin in a few weeks. It will include a terminal-storage facility at Chongoleani. Eighty percent will be in Tanzania. The venture is also owned by Total Energies, a French energy giant, and CNOOC International, a Chinese energy firm. It is worth $5bn (or?4bn). Due to the waxy nature Lake Albert’s crude oil it will be transported via a heated pipeline, which is the longest in the world. Only a third of the 6.5 billion barrels of reserves, which were first discovered in 2006, has been deemed commercially feasible. Despite the potential economic benefits, opinions in Uganda and elsewhere have been divided by the timing of this project. The European Union intervened in September to stop the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (Eacop) from going ahead. They cited human rights violations and concerns about the environment, and also called for its halt. This intervention was rejected by the Ugandan, Tanzanian, and Kenyan governments, which view the pipeline as essential to their economies. “They are insufferable. They are so shallow. So egocentric. so wrong,” President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda said. Importantly, 92% of Ugandan energy comes from renewable sources. It is 84% in Tanzania. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, it is only 22% for the EU. Elison Karuhanga from Uganda’s chamber for mines and petroleum says that the EU’s comments on the pipeline are “hypocrisy”. “Unlike wealthy nations that will continue to be wealthy even after their oil and gas revenues are removed, we cannot afford the risk of gambling the future of Ugandan generation on hypotheticals,” Mr Karuhanga states. The first oil will be tapped within three years, with at least 230,000 barrels being produced every day at its peak. This is projected to bring Uganda between $1.5bn and $3.5bn per year, which is 30-75% of its annual tax revenues. According to reports, Tanzania will receive at least $12 per barrel, which is close to $1bn annually. Image source: Getty Images. Despite the potential financial gain, Stop Eacop claims that the pipeline will emit 34 million tonnes of harmful CO2 each year. It passes near Murchison Falls National Park, an area rich in biodiversity, as well as farmlands.TotalEnergies, which has a 62% stake in Eacop, told the BBC that the project will have “one of the company’s lowest carbon dioxide emission levels”. The French oil giant TotalEnergies, which holds a 62% stake in Eacop, stated that the pipeline route was designed to minimize its impact on the landscape. It also promises to improve living conditions locally. However, Brian, a Ugandan climate activist, claims that Eacop will only make Uganda a “petrol station for Europe and China” and that the country’s elite will not benefit from the projected carbon dioxide emissions. Brian’s name is not being released for security reasons. Despite the harassment and threats that Eacop opponents have made, Brian continues to push for green energy in Uganda. This is what the country committed to when it signed the Paris Climate agreement, which is a global plan to stop temperatures rising above 1.5C. You only use oil and gas that has been developed. Brian states that if you start developing new oil and gas today, tomorrow, and a month later, and years from now, it will delay the transition process, which will lead to a tipping point for the climate. He says, “I may be a renewable advocate but I’m also practical.” Mr Tiyou states, “I know that we’ll still need some fossil fuel because at this moment people in Africa need power and if they don’t have power it will be difficult to lift them out of poverty.” “Solar and wind may be intermittent. For example, you don’t have sun at night and wind doesn’t always blow when it is needed. People talk about an energy mix, which is a mixture of different sources. “We have reached out to the Tanzanian and Ugandan governments for their comments. Climate Question podcast: What should Africa do about its fossil fuel resources? Despite the Paris Agreement’s urgency, fossil fuel investments still outpace those in renewables. “Partially because you have to look at who is going to benefit from the project. Because you can’t export renewable at this stage, most of the time you use it locally. Guess who will benefit from oil exports? Mr Tiyou is referring to Western countries. Faten Agaad (senior adviser on Climate Diplomacy and Geopolitics at the African Climate Foundation) agrees with this statement. “African countries do not receive the financing necessary for the green transition. This is why countries are turning to fossil fuels to generate incomes. As we speak, the cost of financing fossil fuels is three-fold higher than that for green energy. That’s $30bn to 9bn for renewables. “She also accuses EU of hypocrisy. Eacop plans to build a refinery in Uganda for local consumption, but its crude oil will be primarily exported, especially as a result the ripple-effects from the war in Ukraine. Although Uganda hopes to continue to benefit from its oil, this may not be the case. “We are seeing that Europe is moving towards a transition and not just in Europe. Even in Asia. While China is the world’s largest solar power country, we see other large economies such as Indonesia transitioning. “So the risk for African countries in 20, 30, or 40 years is that they’ll find assets that are not a good investment return on investment,” Ms Aggad states. Next month’s Cop 27 conference will focus on how to balance economic development and fight climate change. They claim that the compensation received was inadequate. Some claim they have invested their money into new businesses that have since failed. Others claimed they had taken up fishing when farming became impossible. Others said they had taken up fishing after farming became too difficult.