Tech
House Republicans move to make Trump’s border policies permanent
After clearing the House’s key committee, a border security bill that codifies several executive orders of Donald Trump is heading to the House Floor after Tuesday.
Despite the objections of Democratic legislators, the House Judiciary Committee passed the Permanent Trump Secure Border Act on Tuesday along party lines after an hour-long marking up.
This legislation was authored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas). It criminalizes visa overstays, increases penalties for illegal entry and effectively ends “catch-and release” policies.
This measure will also strengthen Customs and Border Protection by instructing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to upgrade border facilities, increase staffing and plan workforces and implement more surveillance technologies, such as drones, Radar systems, biometric screens and DNA collections.
The ‘AMERICA First’ immigration overhaul bill would codify TRUMP’s campaign promises once and for all
House conservatives have been pressing GOP leaders for months to codify Trump’s border agenda permanently, as the illegal border crossings are at historic lows under his second term. Republicans claim that without Congress’ action, future presidents could reverse many of these policies.
Jim Jordan, R. Ohio, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said to Fox News Digital that they wanted to ensure that, if ever you get another Joe Biden type president, who would just open up the border, it’ll be much harder for them to do as he did.
Democrats opposed this measure. They argued that any legislation addressing border security must address Immigration and Customs Enforcement reforms and increase pathways for legal migration.
Jamie Raskin (D-Md. ), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, stated during the debate that “we’ve been encouraging the majority to put aside demonizing immigrants in order to pass comprehensive immigration reform, which is bipartisan.”
INSIDE UNDERGROUND ELPASO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, BORDER PATROL SAID CARTELS EXPLOITED TO SMUGGLE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
The conservative House members who voted against the border bill in July and June protested by freezing their floors.
Roy, a reporter earlier in July, said: “We must codify border security and deal with birthright citizenship.”
He said: “These issues are important to the people I represent and have been discussed. We need to act on them.”
The bill may face opposition on the House Floor from moderate Republicans who want temporary protections of the law for agricultural workers.
H.R. The measure closely mirrors H.R.
Some GOP legislators are calling for a vote on the floor to curtail birthright citizenship, after the Supreme Court’s rejection of the Trump Administration’s efforts to curb the practice.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD FOX NEWS APP
Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has introduced legislation in the House called the Anchors Away Act that restricts birthright citizenship for babies with at minimum one parent who is of legal status, and grants the federal government the authority to refuse entry to foreign pregnant women.
Ogles told Fox News Digital that he refused to allow these “anchor babies” to colonize the country.
Tech
France becomes first European Union country to ban social media for kids under 15
After a resounding approval of landmark legislation, the French parliament approved the law by 279 to 81.
According to the law, under the new legislation, it will not be possible for children younger than 15 years old to create new accounts on social media platforms like TikTok or Snapchat after September. Existing accounts will also be banned from January 2027.
In addition, the law requires social media platforms to verify age and ban phones for students in high school starting next year. In French middle and elementary schools, students were prohibited from owning phones.
“France leads the way in Europe for protecting children and teens,” said President Emmanuel Macron, hailing its passage as a historic moment.
In France, the public health agency concluded earlier this year that social media was harmful to teenagers, particularly girls.
Macron made the safety of children online a priority in the last years of his administration. The ban is likely to be the most significant domestic reform he implements. Macron is set to celebrate a decade of office in 2019. He cannot be re-elected in the April national elections because, as in the U.S.A., France also has a limit on consecutive terms for presidents.
Does it Work?
The biggest problem, according to critics, will be the enforcement. Some question whether the technology used to verify age is strong enough to stop children accessing social networks.
Teenagers may be able to bypass restrictions using VPNs or fake birth dates or by creating accounts with older family or friends.
Some privacy campaigners claim that age verifications could require more information from users, while other people argue it will simply drive young people to less-regulated sites rather than reduce the time spent online.
The global implementation of social media restrictions is a grave threat to millions of users’ freedoms and privacy. CBS News reported that requiring users to submit sensitive ID information or biometric data to access social networks does not protect children, but poses serious privacy and cybersecurity risks to all users.
In Australia, we have seen that social media restrictions can be easily circumvented. Some children are even able to bypass age-gates by simply drawing fake moustaches. Thomas stated that governments who want to combat the damaging business practices of social networking companies should regulate the companies directly and not impose restrictions on their users.
Australia’s experience raised concerns over the feasibility of blanket prohibitions.
Australia was the first nation to ban under-16s accessing social media by the year 2025. Around 70% of Australian parents surveyed by Australia’s Internet regulator in March stated that their children were still on social media platforms after finding ways to circumvent age-gating mechanisms.
French law includes exemptions to educational platforms, online encyclopedias and other similar services.
Trends and wider trends in “digital sovereignty”
Social media is banned in France as part of a broader push for digital sovereignty by Macron and some EU partners. It is argued that Europe needs to become less reliant on American technology firms and Chinese companies while enforcing a stricter regulation of the digital economy, and promoting European alternatives.
Macron stated in a January post to X, that “the brains of French children are not for sales.” “Neither to American platforms or to Chinese networks.”
This strategy goes beyond the social media. France and Germany announced recently plans to create an alternative military software to that supplied by U.S. tech giant Palantir. Meanwhile, France’s internal intelligence agency ended their contract with Palantir earlier in the year.
While France may be the first EU country to implement such a prohibition, it’s unlikely that they will be the last.
Last week, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission said that it was clear age restrictions should be placed on platforms.
The U.K. announced last month that it would ban social media accounts under 16 years old from January 20, 2027.
France is now the only country after Australia to have a national social media ban.
France could be a test case for other nations, such as Canada, Denmark, and Malaysia. They are all weighing up legislation that will restrict the access of children to social media.
Tech
AMD’s Zen 6 EPYC Venice Pictured as a 256-Core Monster, Massive Twin I/O Dies & First 2nm HPC Chip To Enter Volume Ramp
AMD
AMD
Due All
AMD While Computer
AMD AMD
AMD Each These
AMD
Agent Compet N AMD
Early
AMD
Family NameAMD EPYC VeranoAMD EPYC Venice-DenseAMD EPYC VeniceAMD EPYC Turin-XAMD EPYC Turin-DenseAMD EPYC TurinAMD EPYC SienaAMD EPYC BergamoAMD EPYC Genoa-XAMD EPYC GenoaAMD EPYC Milan-XAMD EPYC MilanAMD EPYC RomeAMD EPYC Naples Family BrandingEPYC 9007EPYC 9006EPYC 9006EPYC 9005EPYC 9005EPYC 9005EPYC 8004EPYC 9004EPYC 9004EPYC 9004EPYC 7004EPYC 7003EPYC 7002EPYC 7001 Family Launch20272026202620252025202420232023202320222022202120192017 CPU ArchitectureZen 6+Zen 6CZen 6Zen 5Zen 5CZen 5Zen 4Zen 4CZen 4 V-CacheZen 4Zen 3Zen 3Zen 2Zen 1 Process NodeTBD2nm TSMC2nm TSMC4nm TSMC3nm TSMC4nm TSMC5nm TSMC4nm TSMC5nm TSMC5nm TSMC7nm TSMC7nm TSMC7nm TSMC14nm GloFo Platform NameSP7SP7SP7SP5SP5SP5SP6SP5SP5SP5SP3SP3SP3SP3 SocketTBDTBDTBDLGA 6096 (SP5)LGA 6096 (SP5)LGA 6096LGA 4844LGA 6096LGA 6096LGA 6096LGA 4094LGA 4094LGA 4094LGA 4094 Max Core CountTBD2569612819212864128969664646432 Max Thread CountTBD51219225638425612825619219212812812864 Max L3 CacheTBD1024 MB? The (48 MB/CCD)1536 MB384 MB384 MB256 MB256 MB1152 MB384 MB768 MB256 MB256 MB64 MB Chiplet DesignTBD8 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 2 IOD?8 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 2 IOD16 CCD’s (1CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD12 CCD’s (1CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD16 CCD’s (1CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD8 CCD’s (1CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD12 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD12 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD12 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD8 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD8 CCD’s (1 CCX per CCD) + 1 IOD8 CCD’s (2 CCX’s per CCD) + 1 IOD4 CCD’s (2 CCX’s per CCD) Memory SupportTBDDDR5-8000+DDR5-8000+DDR5-6400DDR5-6400DDR5-6400DDR5-5200DDR5-5600DDR5-4800DDR5-4800DDR4-3200DDR4-3200DDR4-3200DDR4-2666 Memory ChannelsTBD16-Channel (SP7)16-Channel (SP7)12 Channel (SP5)12 Channel12 Channel6-Channel12 Channel12 Channel12 Channel8 Channel8 Channel8 Channel8 Channel PCIe Gen SupportTBD128-192 PCIe Gen 6128-192 PCIe Gen 6TBD128 PCIe Gen 5128 PCIe Gen 596 Gen 5128 Gen 5128 Gen 5128 Gen 5128 Gen 4128 Gen 4128 Gen 464 Gen 3 TDP (Max)TBD~600W~600W500W (cTDP 600W)500W (cTDP 450-500W)400W (cDP 320-400W)70-225W320W (cTDP 400W)400W400W280W280W280W200W
Tech
OpenAI says its AI went rogue and launched ‘unprecedented’ cyber-attack
OpenAI revealed that some of its advanced AI models hacked an start-up company after they lost control during a test.
ChatGPT said that its AI agent, which is a system capable of operating alone with human guidance after being given instructions by a tester, was tested in an environment controlled but it found weaknesses and managed to escape.
The hackers targeted Hugging Face in order to gain access to internal systems.
OpenAI called the incident “unprecedented” and said it would conduct an investigation with Hugging Face. Clement Delangue, Hugging Face’s boss said on X that it was “mind blowing how all this autonomously happened”.
Delangue said that the investigation was ongoing and they would be sharing more information about what could have been a first of its kind.
Gina Neff of the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, University of Cambridge told BBC Radio 4 Today that security tests, or sandboxes, are intended to “be secure environments in which you can see the capabilities of models”.
She added, “In this instance it appears that OpenAI did not make a sandbox secure enough.”
The agents instead created their own hacking attack against the sandbox, discovering a weakness that allowed them to escape.
The AI, once outside the building, identified Hugging Face to be a source that could provide the answers it was seeking for the test and attempted access.
Hugging Face’s initial disclosure on the 16th of July said that it had not yet determined whether customer data or information about partners were affected. It would, if needed, contact those parties affected.
The company said that it had now repaired the systems affected by the incident, and closed all vulnerabilities exposed in the event.
To defend an online platform, it is necessary to treat the model and data surface as first class attack surfaces and use AI for defence.
We will continue to invest there and share what we have learned.
This incident raised new questions regarding the abilities of AI systems that are more advanced and if existing safeguards will be sufficient when technology is developed.
Spencer Starkey is an executive with the cyber-security company SonicWall. He told BBC that the incident showed organisations they needed to “step up their defences” and treat cyber resilience as “a core operational prioritiy”.
He said: “The truth is, too many organizations are still fighting at human speeds while their adversaries have escalated to machine-speed.”
The best offensive tools cannot be used because they are behind barriers that do not understand context.
Jake Moore, ESET’s global cyber security advisor, suggested that the announcement might also include a competition element.
Tech
Live updates: US-Iran war, Rubio warns Tehran ‘not serious’ about talks, US strikes continue
Donald Trump has continued to say that the US would attack Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain. This is a suspected underground nuclear facility where Israel believes Tehran stored a part of its stockpile of enriched uranium and advanced enrichment centrifuges.
What we know so far about Pickaxe Mountain
What is this? Pickaxe Mountain, a fortified underground facility in the middle of the country is located about one mile south of Natanz’s uranium enrichment plant that was bombed previously by Israel and the US.
The construction of the facility started in 2020. At the time, Iran reported the facility to UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as a facility that would be used to build centrifuges to make nuclear fuel. Construction is ongoing, and it’s believed that the facility has not been operational yet.
Does it have enriched uranium? CNN reported that Israeli intelligence believed Iran had moved a part of their enriched uranium to Pickaxe Mountain following the June attacks. Trump, on Tuesday however, seemed to downplay the Israeli reports by saying, “We do not have it recorded.”
Can it be attacked? Analysts are divided. A ground operation is complex. However, a report by the Institute for Science and International Security, (ISIS), outlined several ways to attack. These include exploitation of ventilation, heating and cooling, delivery, power supply and personnel on site.
The core of the plant is probably buried deep underground, so strikes may not be as effective.
Click here to read the complete story.
CNN’s video shows smoke and fire rising from an airport near Behbahan in Iran, following reports by state-run media that the US had attacked this city.
Video of buildings on fire near Behbahan Northwest Airport, central Khuzestan Province.
Iranian media have reported that strikes were carried out in a variety of areas of the south and west of the country, overnight.
IRIB, the state broadcaster, reported that air defenses had been activated for the capital Tehran. There were, however, no immediate reports about damage. Airstrikes were also conducted on Kabudarahang city, located 150 miles to the west.
IRIB, citing local officials, reported that Tabriz in northwest Iran was also hit.
According to the state news agency IRNA, explosions could also be heard near the Strait of Hormuz in Mahshahr, Sirik and Bushehr. State media also reported that the port cities Konarak, and Chabahar in southwest Iran were attacked.
Yasha Saebi contributed reporting.
We need to be honest and direct.
John Kennedy, a Republican senator from Massachusetts, dispensed his typical patter and spoke bluntly on behalf of the country in a speech delivered Tuesday at Capitol Hill.
Kennedy, as well as Americans interested in knowing how long and what the cost of President Donald Trump’s war would be were seeking answers from Pete Hegseth.
The didn’t have them.
In a hearing, Republicans remained steadfast in the face of an unpopular administration that was waging war. Democrats, on the other hand, highlighted the difference between the premature victories the Administration had made and the current impasse.
It is important to remember that the hearing was a critical moment for the administration. They are asking for huge amounts of money for a conflict they have never been able to control, explain or measure.
Click here to read the complete story.
According to an official in the Trump administration, a dignified transfer will be made today of US military personnel who were killed during the war against Iran.
CNN reported that the official said four members of Dover Air Force Base will be transferred.
Pentagon said previously that three US servicemen were killed on the weekend. Two of them died at a base in Jordan, while the third was in northern Iraq. The US also said they found unidentified remains after one serviceman had been reported missing.
Karoline Lavitt, White House Press Secretary said that President Donald Trump would attend a dignity transfer on Tuesday. She later revealed the event had been delayed.
Wall Street Journal and New York Times published a report late on Tuesday that the Trump administration had agreed to sign a civilian nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia.
CNN reported on the weekend the White House tentatively had agreed to let Saudi Arabia enrich uranium, without international safeguards to prevent the development of nuclear weapons. CNN cited sources who were familiar with this matter as well as documents that they reviewed. It was waiting for President Donald Trump to sign the deal.
The New York Times quoted unnamed US government officials as saying that the agreement was to be announced on Wednesday. The Wall Street Journal reported, however, that Trump has now officially approved the deal.
Saudi Arabia’s nuclear program could be controversial both in the country and throughout the Middle East. Israel has been very wary about Saudi Arabia gaining access to nuclear technology. Israel is widely thought to possess undeclared nukes. Iran, Saudi Arabia’s main regional rival, is believed to have a large stock of uranium that could be used to make nuclear weapons. It has pledged to continue its nuclear program despite months of US bombing, saying it was for civil purposes.
The two primary ways to produce the nuclear weapon core are through uranium enrichment or plutonium processing. The majority of countries that require enriched Uranium for civilian reactors don’t make it themselves. Instead, they purchase it from suppliers like Russia or the US and receive it under international control in sealed shipments.
CNN reported that two sources with knowledge of the issue told them over the weekend, the US has imposed stipulations on the provision governing uranium enrichment. However, the details regarding any limitations remain unclear.
The “123 Agreement” will not be the last word in determining whether Saudi Arabia receives sensitive technologies and materials.
Mohammed bin Salman – Saudi Arabia’s crown prince – has threatened in the past to develop his own nuclear weaponry if Iran were to acquire a bomb.
During his opening remarks to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN), Marco Rubio, US Secretary of state said that Iran was “not serious” about the talks.
Rubio stated that the problem with Iran (at present) was that it is not serious in its talks. We’re only serious if they are. “If they are not serious, we will take the necessary steps to protect both our interests and those of our allies.”
Rubio stated that the “fundamental principles of freedom of Navigation” are at risk.
He said: “If this is in danger, I believe the global economy and rules that have supported 150 years of trade and commerce internationally are also at risk.”
Tech
Trump approves nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia
WASHINGTON, D.C. (AP) – According to two sources familiar with the situation, President Donald Trump approved an agreement that would allow Saudi Arabia the ability to enrich uranium for the country’s civilian nuclear program.
People who weren’t authorized to publicly comment on the decision that has yet to be announced said it is likely to be made public as soon as this Wednesday.
Deal is anticipated to be for 30 years. U.S. companies are expected to participate in the development of this program. A joint study by the United States and Saudi Arabia could lead to the construction of an uranium-enrichment facility in Saudi Arabia.
The deal could be a problem for lawmakers, who are concerned that allowing the Saudis to fulfill their desire to enrich uranium, as they have done since the 1970s, will lead to new nuclear competition and proliferation.
Saudi Arabia belongs to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a Vienna based organization that promotes nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, but also conducts inspections of nations in order to verify they do not have secret atomic weapon programs.
According to one person, the IAEA Additional Protocol which allows for greater monitoring, inspections, and verification is unlikely to be included in the agreement.
This announcement is expected in the middle of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, which was launched in part to eliminate Tehran’s nuclear weapons capability. Iran insists its nuclear enrichment is peaceful.
The Wall Street Journal was the first to report on this decision. The White House, as well as Saudi officials at Riyadh, did not respond immediately when asked for comments.
Trump and the former president Joe Biden both tried to negotiate a deal to transfer American nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia.
Nonproliferation specialists warn that spinning centrifuges in Saudi Arabia may open the way to the possibility of a weapons program within the country. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has already suggested he would pursue this if Iran were to obtain an atomic weapon.
Chris Wright, the Energy secretary at the time of Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia in 2017, visited Saudi Arabia shortly before Trump and met with his Saudi counterpart about the development of the commercial nuclear energy industry. Requests for comments late Tuesday were not responded to immediately by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Saudi Arabia, which has nuclear weapons, and Pakistan have already signed a mutual defence pact following Israel’s attack against Qatar that targeted Hamas officials. Pakistan’s Defense Minister then stated that the nuclear program of his country “will be available” if required to Saudi Arabia. This was seen as an warning to Israel who had long been believed to be Middle East’s sole nuclear-armed nation.
It’s not enough to enrich uranium for a country to have a nuke weapon. They must also master other techniques, such as the use of high-explosives synchronized. It does, however, open up the possibility of weaponization. This is what has caused the West to be concerned about Iran’s nuclear program.
United Arab Emirates (UAE), a Saudi Arabian neighbor, has signed a so-called “123 agreement” to help build the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant with South Korean support. The UAE, however, did not seek enrichment. Nonproliferation specialists have referred to this as “the gold standard” of nations seeking atomic energy.
___
Gambrell reported from Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, while Price was based in Manila, Philippines. Will Weissert, Matthew Daly and other AP writers contributed to this article from Washington.
-
Business1 week agoCalifornia roadside icon, closed for years, to be demolished
-
PM office canada1 week agoSenior PMO staff shakeup further fuels ongoing cabinet shuffle speculation
-
BBC News World5 days ago‘Send help rather than complain,’ Canada’s Ford tells US as wildfire smoke blankets parts of North America
-
Food1 week agoMexico-US relations are already strained, but experts say they’re about to get worse
-
Business2 weeks ago
What Smart People Are Saying About Apple’s Lawsuit Against OpenAI
-
HealthNews1 week ago
Schoolgirl’s response to being told about dad’s terminal cancer
-
Entertainment1 week agoMadeline Miller and Emily Wilson Tell Us What Is Epic About the ‘Odyssey’
-
Video2 weeks agoSylvia Earle opens up about her historic walk into the deep
