Will scrapping tax breaks help? Will scrapping tax breaks help?11 hours agoTiffanie TurnbullandLana Lam,SydneyGettySebastian Munoz-Najar has only just finished primary school. The 13-year old is still a long way from learning to drive. He is not legally allowed to work. He cannot legally work. It’s sad to see that this issue is affecting how the current generation views Australia and how their lives should be. He told the BBC. Others say the rule changes unfairly threaten the wealth they’ve spent their lives toiling for.But many younger Australians like Sebastian argue the social contract that hard work is rewarded has long been broken anyway.They feel they have been denied the kinds of opportunities their parents enjoyed, and hope the changes will begin rebalancing the playing field and bring housing security back in reach for future generations.SuppliedA lucrative investmentAustralia has some of the least affordable cities on Earth. The average property now costs almost 10 times an ordinary household’s income, quadruple what it was about 25 years ago, and rents have doubled over a similar period.The simple fact is that Australia does not have enough homes for its growing population, which is driving unaffordability.Decades of inadequate investment in social housing, sluggish construction rates, and Australia’s restrictive planning laws – which limit homes being built where most people want to live – have taken a toll.But there have long been arguments that housing tax breaks are also increasing strain on the system.The main culprits are negative gearing, which allows owners of investment properties to detract any losses from their taxable income, and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount which means people selling an asset are only taxed on half their profits.Together, they have made housing a more lucrative investment, incentivising the buying and selling of homes for profit.Wages had roughly kept up with house prices until they were introduced around the start of the millennium. This was a turning point in both economic and social terms, analysts say.But these tax settings are staunchly defended by many homeowners – who are quite content to see house prices climb and their wealth grow – as well as investors and industry figures who say change threatens their profits and the essential role they perform in the market.Bearing the brunt of the crisis are young people: They tend to face the quandary of saving for larger and larger deposits while paying greater rents, before servicing longer mortgages with high repayments relative to their income – all often for smaller houses further from work.GettySebastian’s parents themselves quietly harboured concerns about their children’s futures, but were upset to find out this was weighing so heavily on his mind. “I was thinking about two things,” Ed, his father, tells the BBC. “The first is that you shouldn’t be worrying about it. You should be more concerned about your homework, your friends, and school. The second is that you don’t need to take it lying down. Together they put their anger into action by creating a website that outlined their calculations and launching a petition to change the CGT discount, and negative gearing. The petition has attracted thousands of signatures. Sebastian says, “We hope that this will remove the incentive for people to use houses as an investment and return them to being homes.” Labor proposed changes to CGT and negative gearing at successive elections in 2016, and 2019. It lost both elections, and many blamed its housing promises. But since 2019, the housing crisis has gotten worse, with its impact reaching higher up the class ladder. The demographics have also changed, with disenfranchised zillennials and millennials now making up a larger share of the voting base. Many of their parents are also seeing the crisis impact their loved ones for first time. Danielle Wood, the chair of the Productivity Commission (the government’s independent economic think tank), told the BBC that the situation was “like a slow-boiling frog”. It has been building up for over 20 years and has now reached a crisis point. “I think that these tax changes are symbolic of what has caused this problem. “Retired couple Cliff and Christine Hill dismiss the complaints of younger generation. Cliff, 64, says that they were able to afford their first house by moving out into the suburbs, saving money and not taking “expensive overseas vacations”. “You can’t complain that houses are $1m, because they’re not. He says that although they are $500,000 or $600,000. “Young people don’t want live 35km away from Melbourne,” he said. The couple owns their home in Hoppers Crossing in Melbourne’s west suburbs and has three investment properties. They sold a four-bedder they bought in 2010 for only $320,000 and sold it for $668,000. They say the tax reforms of Tuesday are a recipe disaster. “The government are going after the inter-generational gap that they keep talking about – and being a baby boomer, I’m really over that,” says Christine. “The government are going after the inter-generational gap that they keep talking about – and being a baby boomer, I’m really over that,” says Christine.SuppliedBut elsewhere Labor is seeing signs that public mood has changed enough for them to try again: one such hint perhaps being the backlash to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s purchase of a multi-million-dollar cliff-top home in 2024.In their first budget after a landmark election win – which comes as appetite for action on the housing crisis feeds minor parties – the government has promised to replace the CGT discount with a markdown in line with inflation, and limit negative gearing to new builds only. The government has promised to replace the CGT discount with a markdown in line with inflation and limit negative gearing to new builds only. The benefits of these policies will not be lost by those who have already benefited from them. The tax changes will likely lead to a slight dip in housing prices. By reducing investor demand, this will allow more room for first-time homebuyers and owner-occupiers. “[But] [they’re] not a panacea for house prices,” says Wood. The blame is increasingly being shifted towards migration, with both the Coalition opposition and the right-wing One Nation pushing for cuts to ease the demand. Wood says, “We need to make building easier and faster.” Construction regulations are essential for safety but there are so many approvals and processes to navigate, that build times have slowed down by about 40% over the past 15 years. He notes that many own investment properties and that the decision to grandfather in the change protects these people. “Young people feel let down… they are disappointed in policymakers who allowed this to happen. They also feel sad that the “Australian Dream” of owning a home is not achievable for them. “Australia’s looming election brings housing crisis into focusThe year the Australian Dream diedThe newest victims of Australia’s homelessness crisisHousingAustralia