Updated on Friday, June 12 at 4:22 p.m. ET — Meta’s status page indicates that all disruptions have been restored and all disruptions are now concluded.
Updated on Friday, June 12, at 1:26 p.m. ET — Andy Stone, Meta VP of Communications, posted an update on X that stated Meta services were being restored.
The Meta status page for its business services listed most of the June 12 disruptions as resolved. “We have recovered from an earlier outage impacting Ads Creation and Editing, and services have now been restored. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.” However, the WhatsApp Business Platform still showed “High Disruptions” as of this writing.
Updated on Friday, June 12 at 1:15 p.m. ET — As of this writing, the outages for Meta’s services appear to be on their way out, at least according to DownDetector. Meta has not provided an official cause for the outage yet, however.
Some of Meta’s products had a hard time on Friday morning.
Mashable Light Speed
Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?
Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Light Speed newsletter.
By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Thanks for signing up!
Services like Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp all experienced temporary service outages to start the weekend. The cause is unknown at this point in time, but Meta’s VP of Communications, Andy Stone, acknowledged the outage on X.
Stone said Meta’s engineers are working on it.
In addition, the platform DownDetector recorded spikes in user error reports for Meta products on Friday. A peak of 10,000 users reported problems accessing Instagram, with the majority reporting problems with the app.
According to DownDetector users (Disclosure: Mashable and Down Detector have the same parent company, Davis), Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, and WhatsApp all experienced problems starting in the late morning on Friday. On top of that, Meta’s status page for its business applications also noted “High Disruptions” on Friday morning, too.
Anecdotally, multiple Mashable staff members have had a hard time posting or sending messages on Instagram during this outage. It’s unclear exactly when the problem will be resolved, but at the very least, Meta is aware of it and is doing something about it.
This is a developing story…

Two events from the past week help crystallize this strange, contradictory moment for the U.S. economy.
On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the surge in energy prices had wiped out a year and a half of wage gains for the average American worker. On Friday, the public-markets debut of SpaceX made Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire.
That stark juxtaposition helps explain why many Americans, in survey after survey, say they no longer believe the U.S. economy is working for them. A few people are getting fabulously, unimaginably wealthy at the same time that entire generations of families worry they will never be able to afford to buy a house, raise children or enjoy a comfortable retirement.
“I don’t think the stock market is necessarily causing” Americans’ pessimism about the economy, said Stefanie Stantcheva, a Harvard professor who studies public sentiment. “But I don’t think people are looking at it and are thinking, ‘Great, this means I’m going to do very well, too.’ It’s potentially reinforcing this feeling of ‘I’m falling behind.’”
Inequality is hardly a new feature in America. But the explosion of wealth at the very top is without precedent in U.S. history. At the height of the Gilded Age at the end of the 19th century, the richest handful of Americans had a net worth equivalent to about 3 percent of the country’s annual economic output, according to data compiled by the French economists Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez. Today, the fortunes of the same 0.00001 percent — about 20 individuals — make up roughly four times as large a share, equivalent to 12 percent of annual output.
Other economists, using different methodologies, come up with somewhat different numbers. But hardly anyone disputes the basic fact that the wealthiest few have made extraordinary gains in recent years.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is pulling back the curtain on a 22,000 square-foot replica town on its Huntsville, Alabama campus that it built to train law enforcement in simulating and investigating real-world cyberattacks.
The aim is to teach investigators in a secure environment beyond the classroom by getting hands-on with some of the latest consumer and enterprise technologies, many of which are frequently targeted by malicious hackers. The numbers put the training into context. The FBI’s 2025 Internet Crime Report, drawing on more than one million complaints, logged a record $20.9 billion in U.S. cybercrime losses, a 26% jump over the prior year, with ransomware ranked the top ongoing threat to critical infrastructure.
Dubbed the Kinetic Cyber Range, the FBI’s small purpose-built town opened in February 2025 and features fully furnished houses, a hotel, a gas station and grocery mart, a courthouse, a hospital, and a power company — complete with roads and traffic lights — designed to mimic a real U.S. community. Since opening, says the agency, the facility has trained more than 1,400 students, including FBI personnel and partners from other federal and local agencies.
Each part of the town is wired with functioning devices and systems that behave as they would in a real community or business, while preventing any simulated attacks from spilling out of the facility.
The range also includes a data center with more than 200 physical servers — some running Windows, some Linux — reflecting the corporate environments investigators are likely to encounter when responding to a breach or executing a search warrant. “They’re cold, they’re cramped, they’re noisy, they’re dark, they’re miserable,” Dave Beachboard, the range’s program manager, explains in the FBI’s write-up about the training environment.
The replica town also allows the FBI to simulate ransomware attacks and their real-world consequences, including the high-pressure decisions that investigators must make when responding to incidents that could cause harm to people, such as hospital systems going dark.

Amazing things are happening in technology, and ordinary investors are being invited to get a piece of the action.
With the SpaceX market debut on Friday, the Anthropic and OpenAI initial public offerings in the pipeline, and the sizzling tech stocks already on the market, there’s no shortage of betting opportunities.
Elon Musk ignited a frenzy with his roadshow for SpaceX, promising a future of interstellar riches from artificial intelligence combining spaceflight, satellites and orbiting A.I. data centers. I watched his presentation at JPMorgan and was entranced.
Who am I to say that cheap, virtually limitless A.I. generated from Earth’s orbit won’t happen just as Mr. Musk says it will? Intellectually, I’m willing to contemplate the possibility that he is truly leading the world to a vibrant future, on this planet, on the moon and eventually on Mars.
But from a purely investing perspective, I’m keeping my feet firmly on the ground.
As I’ve pointed out, the price being asked for SpaceX shares was exorbitant, and it rose even higher on its first day of trading. That said, the company’s stock might well rise further over the next few weeks, driven by sheer market enthusiasm. Mr. Musk reserved a double-digit percentage of the I.P.O. shares for “retail,” or ordinary, investors — as opposed to big institutions. A retail allocation of 5 percent or less has been customary in most recent public offerings, according to Jay Ritter, an economist and I.P.O. expert at the University of Florida.
But SpaceX’s price is so high that, for investors coming late to the party, the probability of a solid return in the next several years is low. Historical data provided by Mr. Ritter bears that out.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Anthropic said it would disable access to its latest top AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, following a government export control that would bar foreign individuals and entities from using the products.
The company said in a blog post on Friday evening that it had received a letter from the US government at around 5:21 p.m. ET, citing national security concerns regarding Anthropic’s models.
Anthropic said the government’s order included any foreign national inside or outside the US, “including foreign national Anthropic employees,” and that the “net effect” of the order is to disable the models for everyone to ensure compliance.
The company added that the letter “did not provide specific details of its national security concern.”
Anthropic said it believes the government’s concern is a potential way to “jailbreak” Fable 5, but disputed the issue’s severity. The company said the technique appeared narrow, not universal, and involved known vulnerabilities that could be identified by other publicly available models.
The move marks the latest escalation in Anthropic’s clash with the Trump administration over AI safety, national security, and the extent of government control over frontier AI models.
In February, the Pentagon moved to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk after the startup sought limits on its AI model for certain defense applications.
Anthropic sued the Defense Department over the designation. Two lawsuits related to the government’s supply-chain risk label remain pending.
A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Pentagon’s chief information officer expressed support for the move in an X post, writing, “Some things are simply more important than revenue cycles, clickbait, and pre-IPO valuation.”
Anthropic said it was complying with the order but disagreed with the government’s finding. An Anthropic spokesperson did not say when exactly the company would disable access.
Access to Anthropic’s other models will not be affected, the company said.