Chris Mason: PM facing awkward hours ahead as Mandelson questions remain1 hour agoChris MasonPolitical editorAFP via Getty ImagesI occasionally like to kid myself that after 20-plus years of reporting from Westminster, I can’t be entirely surprised any more.Then, along came the row of the last few days after The Guardian’s revelations about Lord Mandelson, his vetting and the removal of the most senior civil servant at the Foreign Office, Sir Olly Robbins.It all prompted a one-word question from many of us: how?How could so senior a civil servant be in possession of such apparently politically explosive information and not pass it on to the prime minister and others?And how could a prime minister, embarking on a high-profile and controversial appointment, be so insufficiently curious that he didn’t prise this information out of the government machine?Context is key here: in January of last year, Sir Olly had just arrived at the Foreign Office as its permanent under-secretary.Weeks before, his predecessor, Sir Philip Barton, had worked through the formal niceties of confirming Lord Mandelson’s appointment to Washington, such as writing to the King about it on the 18th of December.In other words, it was a done deal. Whitehall and the civil service were aware of Sir Keir’s wishes. We know that some vetting concerns had been raised with the Prime Minister. The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 states that the secretary of state is responsible for managing the diplomatic service, but does not cover national security screening. This is a reference for the foreign secretary, and it gives Sir Olly’s anticipated defense, that the law says he should not reveal information gathered during the vetting. But on Sunday night the government released a statement outlining its interpretation of the act, claiming The government even read the explanatory notes to the Act in order to support their position. I suspect the prime minister will also refer to the Civil Service Code. This states that civil servants cannot “deceive, or knowingly mislead Ministers, Parliament, or others The Conservatives hope that Monday afternoon’s debate will “hasten squeaky-bum time for Labour MPs” by suggesting that Sir Keir beheaded more people than Henry VIII. The mood in the Labour Party has changed over the past few weeks. It is no longer as fervently angry. Now the question is whether this fiasco will raise the temperature again. “Let’s face it, this is bad stuff,” said one to me. Another says, “It reignites all the things that made so many angry with him in the first place.” The timing of the elections, which are just a few days away, could not be worse. Meanwhile, the Financial Times reports that Sir Olly may take legal action to challenge his dismissal. It’s not surprising that he was blasted out of the cannon so spectacularly by the foreign secretary and prime minister over the appointment of an Ambassador who had been signed off even before Sir Olly arrived at the Foreign Office. The people who have worked with him describe him as “a by the book man”, who has a distinguished career in the public service, and is “diligent and careful about processes and acting correctly.” The tone and tenor will be as interesting as his testimony. The document sent to him on the same day says “you should submit a new STRAP application form for your new position, at least 3 months before you are due to start at Post”.

Reform pledges to review all asylum claims for past five years if it wins power2 hours agoJennifer McKiernanPolitical reporterHome Office/ PA MediaReform UK has pledged an immediate review of all asylum claims from the last five years should the party win the next general election.Around 400,000 people would be liable for deportation under the plans, which would target anybody granted asylum, overstaying a visa, or from a country deemed safe by a Reform-led government.The current Labour government has announced major crackdowns on immigration, including disrupting human trafficking gangs, emptying asylum hotels and increasing the time before indefinite leave to remain is granted.Conservatives claimed Reform was copying their policies “but without the detail”, and Liberal Democrats called it an “impractical farce” of a policy.Reform, led by Nigel Farage, has previously announced it would bar anyone arriving on a small boat, and suggested this could mean 600,000 deportations over five years. Reform, led by Nigel Farage, has previously announced it would bar anyone arriving on a small boat and suggested this could mean 600,000. Yusuf said to BBC Breakfast on Monday: “I want this to be emphasized.” “We will not allow the British people to be exploited.” Yusuf explained how he thought building “modular detention capacity” for 22,500 people, would allow for that many to be sent home each month, just as it had been done in America, and said this would lead detentions to total “a quarter million” a year. He also said the party wants to “turn off” welfare for anyone arriving illegally. This would mean ending free accommodation, and an “endless cycle” of appeals. If it was easy, it would have already been done. What’s been missing is political willpower. Home Secretary Shabana Mahamood has taken “decisive actions” to reduce small boat crossings. “We have already stopped more than 42,000 illegal migrants from crossing the Channel since the General Election,” they added. “We have removed, or deported, nearly 60,000 people who had no right to be in the country. “Conservative Chris Philp accused Reform of copying badly his own proposals. “The Conservatives already proposed a detailed border plan to withdraw from the ECHR, and completely ban asylum requests by illegal immigrants,” he stated. “Instead, they would be deported within a week after arrival.” “He said that the Tories would deport around 150,000 immigrants a year who had no right to be here in the UK. He added: “Reform has slowly caught up with our ideas, but without the details that will ensure they work in practice. Will Forster, Liberal Democrat immigration and asylum spokesman, attacked Reform’s plans for “hostility” that he claimed would “do nothing to fix our broken asylum system”. He said that the Conservatives’ mess had left us with a huge backlog. “Reviewing the five years of asylum grants will only slow down the process further. His party has called for temporary centers to be established to clear the backlog of asylum applications within six months, so that “those who have a right to stay here can get on with their life and support themselves and those without a right can be quickly returned”. She added: “We must offer compassion and sanctuary and not insecurity, terror and intimidation. Reform plans to scrap indefinite stay for migrants. Reform promises agency to ensure illegal migration removals. Sign up for our Politics Essential Newsletter to read top political analyses, gain insight from all over the UK, and stay up-to-date on the big moments. It’ll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.UK immigrationDeportationShabana Mahmood

Frustration, hope and apathy: Birmingham divided in extraordinary election11 hours agoRebecca WoodsandKathryn Staczyszyn in BirminghamGetty ImagesThe UK’s second largest city could see the biggest political change in over a decade. It’s possible, however, that those who always voted Labour will continue to vote so. Mark Thomas”I’m sure that’s what’ll happen here,” says a man walking along Sparkhill Stratford Road. “I’m telling ya, there are a lot of older people in this area and they’ll see the red rose, and they’ll vote Labour because that’s always what they do. This bustling thoroughfare, like many other parts of the City, is full of independent south Asian shops, cars and shoppers. Some candidates with shared values have formed loose alliances. Fix our potholes Some independents who want to represent areas where there is a large Asian community are pro-Palestinian. They pick up on the frustrations from those who are unhappy with Labour’s response to the Israel/Gaza war. But one Sparkhill shopkeeper said that not everyone was convinced by their arguments. “The narrative is the Muslim vote will go independents regardless. But that’s not true – we want to fight for speed bumps and fix our potholes,” they say. “They can talk about Gaza, every Muslim wants peace. But they won’t be able to solve that problem from Birmingham. “In a halal shop, customers have a variety of opinions. Some support the Greens while others are for the Lib Dems and Reform. “I know you may be surprised,” a young Asian in his 30s tells the growing line of people that he is considering supporting Nigel Farage’s party. “But, I look around and I see that things have gone downhill,” he says. He adds that fly-tipping and other antisocial behavior are among the issues. “I think that we need to change here, and they could be the ones who do it. “Everyone in this shop says they will vote on 7th May, except for one young man. “Don’t misunderstand me, I have voted every year in my life. But not this time,” says he. “They are only interested in themselves and I do not see the point.” Tanveer Mahmood, the supervisor of his local councillors, wants them to be visible in their community. “They come with their flyers, ‘vote me, vote my – but will they be here once the event is over?,” he questions. “A good councillor must be available when we have issues,” he says, citing illegal parkign as a major issue in the area that is rarely resolved. ‘Things are worse’Mohammed Sufyain, who has just returned from Qatar where he set up a tutoring business, says that things seem to be getting worse. “I am 28 years old, I have been out of the country for 2 years and now I’ve returned and things seem worse,” says Sufyain. “Potholes and bins not being collected are a major problem. I don’t believe there have been any improvements. “He hasn’t decided which of Sparkhill’s 14 candidates he’ll vote for. Sufyain continues, “I want someone who is genuine, who cares, and who wants to make a change.” Six miles away, in Northfield shoppers flock in and out of Home Bargains, and B&M are just metres apart. The high street is busy despite recent closures of New Look and Bodycare. Residents also complain about rising crime, fewer police officers and the cost of living. Father-of-two Roger Hackley is a ward worker at City Hospital in Birmingham, traveling across Birmingham during each four-hour-shift. He says his wife died seven year ago and that he had to have his house repossessed recently because he couldn’t pay the mortgage. Hackley doesn’t feel like he is represented by politicians, either locally or nationally. He says, “I won’t vote.” “It’s just not for me.” I don’t understand how they could help me or my loved ones. “Janet Walsh, a specialist dentist, retired last week. She says that she is disillusioned with politics right now and does not think Sir Keir has made the best decision for pensioners. Brian, however, is a keen observer of local politics. “I don’t believe it’s manageable – the largest council in Europe, isn’t? He says. “There is a lot complacency. They’ve also had some unfair pay issues in the previous and that has brought us to the brink. “I don’t believe it’s as bad at the opposition and media have made out. I feel we are on the right track. Labour insists they will continue to work to turn around the city’s fortunes. John Cotton, the leader of the Labour Party, said in February that he was “determined to not repeat the mistakes of the previous”. After delivering a budget and declaring “bankrupt Birmingham”, he declared it no longer accurate. The council is still pushing ahead with its new waste system. The Reform UK conference was held in Birmingham last year as a sign that it was building momentum in preparation for the upcoming elections in Birmingham as well as Coventry Walsall and Sandwell. Farage has said his representatives will “cut expenditures, find waste… keep your On the campaign trail, Farage has said his representatives will “cut expenditures, find waste… keep your council tax rises to a minimum”.Independent candidates are united in saying it’s time to ditch a large political party and instead follow the individual who cares.With this many voices competing for airtime, Brummies have got a challenge on their hands in deciding the future.SIMPLE GUIDE: What elections are taking place in May?EXPLAINER: What can’t you do at a polling station?LOOKAHEAD: When is the next general election?POSTCODE LOOKUP: Is there an election in your area?Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.More on this storyAll you need to know about local elections in Birmingham and the Black CountrySign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.England local elections 2026BirminghamNorthfieldBirmingham City Council

Dugdale is appointed chairwoman for Stonewall by the former Scottish Labour leader. She was the leader of the Scottish Labour Party from August 2017 until August 2019. In 2024, Dugdale warned Scotland’s progress in LGBT equality was “fragile”. She also revealed that she still checks the surroundings before holding the hand of her wife. ‘Deep commitment’Commenting on her appointment, Dugdale said: “Stonewall is fit for the future. She said that the charity was prepared to navigate “these turbulent time”, influence policy, and create more safe places for people to thrive and feel safe. She said, “We won’t cease until everyone has equal rights.” Stonewall said that the former politician would bring a wealth experience in law and public policy. Her skills and experience in academia, politics, and welfare will be an advantage to Stonewall, as we work to create a world where LGBTQ+ people can live, work, and thrive. “Outgoing Chairwoman Ayla Hodom said it was a pleasure to hand over to Dugdale, who she called “the perfect leader”. She added: “Serving as this role has been an immense privilege, made even more meaningful by the incredible trustees I’ve worked alongside. “I am proud of the foundations Stonewall has laid, guided by clarity in purpose and strategy for navigating the turbulence of this time. “Stonewall jobs at risk after Trump’s foreign aid cutsProgress in LGBT rights ‘fragile’ – Kezia DugdaleKezia DugdaleScotlandScottish LabourStonewall

David Lammy, Deputy PM, said that Starmer would not have appointed Mandelson as US Ambassador if he knew he had failed the security vetting. Prime Minister David Lammy has been under pressure since it was revealed this week that Mandelson had been appointed despite security concerns. Downing Street said red flags were not disclosed by the Foreign Office during the vetting process. Sir Keir has said that he was only informed of the situation on Tuesday and that it was “staggering” that he had not been told earlier that Mandelson failed security vetting. The vetting process began after the former minister was selected to be the UK’s representative in Sir Keir said he only learned of the situation Tuesday and said it was “staggering”. He was not informed sooner that Mandelson had failed security vetting. This only began after he was selected to be the UK representative in Washington. Dame Emily Thornberry of the Foreign Affairs Committee has said that new revelations have called into question the evidence Sir Olly provided to MPs back in November. During this time, he failed to disclose the fact that the government’s security vetting agency had advised the Foreign Office not to Cooper told the committee on Saturday that she had requested a review of information provided to MPs by government officials to ensure it was accurate. She also said she was ‘extremely worried’ about ministers not being informed sooner about issues raised during the vetting procedure, whose details have not been The Foreign Affairs Committee is expected to question Sir Olly again on Tuesday. His allies said this week that Sir Olly was bound by the confidentiality of the intrusive screening process, which is why it wasn’t disclosed to Downing Street. Chris Mason: Mandelson nightmare haunts Starmer againSenior official ousted over Mandelson security row to face MPsVetting of government employees and appointees is carried out by an agency overseen by the Cabinet Office, which reports back to hiring departments with recommendations. Chris Mason: Mandelson nightmare plagues Starmer againSenior officials ousted over Mandelson Security Row to face MPsVetting government employees and appointees are carried out by a Cabinet Office-supervised agency, which provides recommendations to hiring departments. “This isn’t just a failure of politics. He has put our national security at risk… he should resign,” she wrote.Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey called for an investigation by the Privileges Committee into whether the prime minister intentionally misled Parliament. He has put our security at risk…he should resign,” wrote she.Liberal Democrats Leader Sir Ed Davey demanded that the Privileges committee investigate whether the Prime Minister intentionally misled the Parliament. The SNP, Green Party, and Reform UK also called for Sir Keir