SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Starbucks’ South Korean operation said Monday it will close all of its stores nationwide early on June 22 for mandatory history and social sensitivity training as it reels from backlash following a marketing campaign that was widely perceived as mocking victims of a brutal military crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in 1980.
Shinsegae Group, which owns a 67.5% stake in Starbucks Korea, said group executives and employees at Starbucks Korea’s headquarters will attend training led by history and sociology professors on Wednesday. All Starbucks stores nationwide will close at 3 p.m. next Monday so employees can watch a recording of the session, Shinsegae said in a statement.
The coffee chain triggered an uproar when it attempted to promote a series of stainless-steel tumblers it called “SS Tank” by declaring May 18 to be “Tank Day.” The date marks the anniversary of the 1980 pro-democracy uprising in the southern city of Gwangju. It was violently suppressed by Seoul’s military government at the time, which deployed troops, tanks and helicopters, leaving hundreds dead or injured.
The campaign further fueled outrage by using the slogan “Thwack it on the table!” which many read as a reference to a notorious 1987 police statement that attempted to cover up the torture death of student activist Park Jong-chol. Authorities had falsely said Park died after investigators “hit the desk with a thwack.”
With the promotion sparking immediate backlash, Shinsegae canceled it within hours and fired the chief executive of Starbucks Korea. Shinsegae Chairman Chung Yong-jin later issued a nationally televised apology as police opened an investigation following complaints from relatives of the victims of the Gwangju crackdown. Chung will undergo separate training with the chief executives of Shinsegae affiliates on June 24.
Shinsegae said the decision to close all Starbucks stores early for the first time since the chain’s 1999 launch in South Korea and require companywide training shows “how seriously it views the marketing controversy and its determination to prevent a recurrence.”
The crackdown in Gwangju came months after General Chun Doo-hwan seized power in a coup in late 1979. Government records show about 200 people died in Gwangju, but activists say the true death toll was much higher. Chun’s government also imprisoned tens of thousands, saying it was rooting out social evils.
Public anger over Chun’s dictatorship led to massive nationwide protests in 1987, forcing him to accept a constitutional revision introducing direct presidential elections, which is widely seen as the start of South Korea’s transition to democracy.

It dates back to September 2008. Shotwell was in a Glasgow hotel bathroom, with the shower running so her husband could sleep, while on the phone with her team to price SpaceX’s bid for a $1.6 billion NASA resupply contract. At the same time, the company’s fourth Falcon 1 launch, which Elon Musk believed was the last one the company could afford before going bankrupt, counted down half a world away.
The rocket reached orbit. Shotwell told Stanford Business School’s View from the Top podcast that she ran down the hotel hallway “in my yoga pants and jammy top,” knocking on her team’s doors, and they “kind of” broke into the hotel bar at two in the morning to drink warm champagne. Ever since, she writes “Scotland” on two sticky notes and puts one in each shoe on launch days, so she is always, technically, in Scotland, and has that moonshot mindset.
Eighteen years later, that woman with paper in her shoes became a billionaire, owning 12.6 million shares of the most valuable company ever to go public. Based on Friday’s closing price, that means her stake is worth more than $2 billion.
The cheerleader who fell in love with an engineer’s shoes
Shoes, as it happens, helped guide Shotwell to where she is now. Shotwell was born in 1963, the middle of three daughters of a brain surgeon and an artist, and raised in Libertyville, Illinois. She watched the Apollo 11 landing at age five and found it boring. At Libertyville High she was a cheerleader and varsity basketball player who finished at the top of her class. But she had no idea what she wanted to do until her mother dragged her—destination undisclosed, because she wouldn’t have gone—to a Society of Women Engineers panel at the Illinois Institute of Technology.
She said the conference bored her until she saw one fabulous woman engineer. “Her shoes were marvelous, her bag matched, and she just made mechanical engineering accessible to me,” Shotwell told Marie Clarie in 2017. “I left that event saying, ‘Okay, I’ll be a mechanical engineer,’ because I thought she was cool.”
What followed was a bit less glamorous. At Northwestern, she was one of three women in an engineering class of 36. She happened to interview at IBM on the day the space shuttle Challenger exploded; shaken, she didn’t get the offer, and went into Chrysler’s management training program instead. Unsatisfied, she went back for a master’s in applied math, then spent a decade at the Aerospace Corporation in El Segundo, Calif., doing thermal analysis, followed by four years running the space systems division at Microcosm, a low-cost rocketry shop.
Then in 2002, she had lunch with a former colleague who’d jumped to a startup called SpaceX. The colleague gave her a tour afterward, and Shotwell talked to Elon Musk for three or four minutes. “I wasn’t looking for a job. I didn’t have a résumé,” she said. But that afternoon, SpaceX called and asked her to apply to run business development.
After a month of hesitation that ended while pulled over on an LA freeway, she became employee No. 11, leaving a stable job where she held a 3% stake.
“I called him on the phone and I said, ‘[I’m] an idiot,’” she recalled at Stanford. Musk laughed and said, “Welcome to the team.”
She had made up her mind at that point that if SpaceX failed, she was done with the industry entirely: “I’d rather sell real estate or be a barista.”
She is still not the “central casting” engineer. She likes wearing black skinny jeans, platform heels and Chardonnay. She reads Outlander novels to fall asleep and has been prepping her 1,000-acre Texas ranch to one day become a vineyard. “I drink a lot of wine,” she joked to Marie Claire. “Actually, reading is probably the thing that calms me the most.”
“I need more data than Elon”
Her job is one that requires inordinate calm. Functionally, the task is converting Musk’s pie-in-the-sky ambitions into practical deadlines. “I need more data than Elon does to make a decision,” she said at Stanford.
The company has a tendency to hit its targets but not its deadlines, a trait she defends without apology: “We fail on timeline, but that feels like the right fail to make.” Musk’s own version, which she repeated to investors on CNBC ahead of the IPO, goes something like, “We make the impossible, we just make it late.”
Now, that doctrine is up to investors to decide. SpaceX’s prospectus promises the world and beyond; AI data centers in orbit by 2028, a Starship that turns around “like an airplane,” and a million-person Mars colony.
When CNBC’s Morgan Brennan asked when to expect that colony, Shotwell guessed 2035, then immediately qualified that she’s “so bad at predicting timelines.”
She asked retail investors to cut the company some slack, adding that she doesn’t want to focus on earnings because “What we’re doing is very futuristic.”
That might work in the short run. But as OpenAI and Anthropic also make their public debuts and swallow oxygen from the capital markets, investors will weigh SpaceX’s version of the future versus the other companies’ lofty goals. Since SpaceX absorbed xAI, it has taken on $29 billion in debt, making it a deeply unprofitable company. The company went “from those penurious Falcon 9 Dragon days to the more expensive capital-intensive Starship, and then to AI, because it is next-level expensive,” Shotwell said.
But the company is used to burning cash. After all, that was the story of its first decades; failed launch after failed launch, enough that Shotwell understands failures as an asset. “If a launch goes perfectly, all you’ve learned is that that launch vehicle on that day worked,” she told investors. “When you have failure, you actually get this treasure trove of data.”
Shotwell embodies the hedge against “key-man risk.” During Musk’s June 2025 feud with President Donald Trump—when Musk threatened to decommission the Dragon capsule—she quietly assured NASA the tensions would boil over.
She has defended him on even more personal levels. Against her press team’s advice, she sent a companywide letter after harassment allegations surfaced in 2022: “I don’t believe he could have done what he was accused of. But he is imperfect. I’m imperfect.”
She argued Musk is “probably the best CEO in history, in my opinion, humble opinion,” and that the supermajority-voting control he holds is correct. Pressed on succession, she allowed only that “the company would not collapse obviously without Elon, but it would by no means be the same.”
But her own ambitions are more modest than Mars. Given a Starship and anywhere to go, she’d pick the moon. After all, Mars takes six months to get to, and “I don’t like to camp.”

A private jet flying from Modesto to Monterey made an emergency landing at Mather Airport in Sacramento County after a landing gear warning light was activated. Flight radar data shows the plane took off from Modesto’s airport around 10 a.m. It reached Monterey but aborted its landing due to the warning light. The pilot flew to Mather Airport, made one pass over the runway while emergency crews got into position, and safely landed the plane at approximately 11:15 a.m. The two people aboard the plane were unhurt.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel
A private jet flying from Modesto to Monterey made an emergency landing at Mather Airport in Sacramento County after a landing gear warning light was activated.
Flight radar data shows the plane took off from Modesto’s airport around 10 a.m. It reached Monterey but aborted its landing due to the warning light.
Advertisement
The pilot flew to Mather Airport, made one pass over the runway while emergency crews got into position, and safely landed the plane at approximately 11:15 a.m.
The two people aboard the plane were unhurt.
See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

Stay up to date with our Up First newsletter, sent every weekday morning.
Crude oil prices sank on Sunday night after President Trump posted on social media that a deal to end the war with Iran was “complete.”
Oil futures markets promptly dropped 4%, after markets reopened for trading following their typical weekend break. Prices had already fallen significantly on Thursday and Friday in anticipation of a deal, bringing the per-barrel price of crude Sunday night down 12% from where it had been in the middle of last week.
Brent crude, the global benchmark, is now below $84 a barrel, and West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, beneath $81. At one point in this conflict, global oil prices had touched $126 a barrel. They remain elevated compared to pre-war prices, which were in the $60s, but are now cheaper than they have been at any point since the very first days of this conflict.
Trump’s initial post on Sunday evening said he was authorizing “the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz,” and directed ships to “start your engines.” Before the war, approximately 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas passed through that waterway, and the disruption of traffic has caused the greatest oil supply shock in history.
In a follow-up post, Trump later said that the strait would reopen “upon the signing of the Deal on Friday, for purposes of mine removal.”
Throughout this conflict, oil prices have repeatedly fallen on headlines promising an imminent deal to reopen the strait; however, they’ve never dropped this low. Significantly, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who has played a central role negotiating between the U.S. and Iran, has confirmed that a deal has been reached.
A rapid reopening of the strait would ease pressure on the world’s oil consumers, particularly in Asia and Europe. However, it would not mean an immediate return to pre-war oil supply levels and prices.
“It could be months before things return to something like the way things were before the war, at least as far as flows out of the Strait of Hormuz go,” says Kevin Book, a managing director at Clearview Energy Partners, an independent research firm. That’s because some oil and natural gas production fields and refineries have been taken offline, or damaged in the conflict. “The facilities that have been shut down, some of them can start fairly quickly. Others may take months.”
Transit takes time, too. Ships also need to move in and out of the strait, and from there around the world.
And over the past few months, the world has tapped into its stockpiles of oil in order to make up for missing supplies; refilling those inventories could keep upward pressure on oil prices for months.
Before the war began, the world had been oversupplied with oil, which was keeping prices low. Book says it’s not clear whether returning to “normal” will mean returning to that status quo.
“It’s not obvious that we’ll be in a surplus any time soon,” he says.

NEW YORK (AP) — High oil and gasoline prices and energy supply problems won’t be solved overnight, despite an agreement to end the Iran war and open the Strait of Hormuz announced Sunday.
It will likely take months before energy companies can resume operations to the point of meeting the world’s demand, according to energy experts. The slow pace of the process of shipping and refining crude oil, and doubts about the security of traveling through the strait mean the effect won’t be seen immediately, they said.
Ships loaded with crude oil have been stranded in the Persian Gulf for more than three months, unable to safely travel through the waterway, through which about a fifth of the world’s oil and gasoline supplies typically traveled before the war began.
“It’s going to take time for people to feel comfortable and for insurance to be in place … particularly to get people on the ground to restart some of these assets,” said Daniel Evans, global head of fuels and refining research at S&P Global Energy.
Still, oil prices slipped early Monday after the deal was announced.
Brent crude, the international standard, was down $3.45 at $83.89 per barrel. U.S. benchmark crude oil lost $4.03 to $80.85 per barrel.
Those prices are still well above the roughly $70 per barrel where oil was trading before the war started.
As the higher prices unwind, ships that have been stranded will have to exit the strait, and then new tankers will have to come in to be loaded, Evans said.
“To bring a ship in, you need to be confident that you’ve got a big enough window of safety to bring it in, load it and move it out,” he added.
Oil tankers also move slowly, he explained. It takes months to travel from the strait to distant countries, deliver the crude oil to a refinery for processing and then arrive at its final destination.
In addition, some producers in the Middle East paused extracting oil from the ground, known as a shut-in, when they ran out of storage space. Restarting those operations can be a slow process.
Countries such as Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, where there are alternate pipelines or routes besides the Strait of Hormuz to deliver oil, may be among the quickest to resume production, said Alan Gelder, senior vice president of refining, chemicals and oil markets at Wood Mackenzie, an analytics firm.
“But places like Iraq could be much more challenged because they’ve had a much bigger shut-in, their fields are more difficult … it may well take about a year before they get back,” he said.
Investment in the energy system, which can take years to see the results, ground to a halt after the strait’s closure, Gelder said. So it will take time for this capital to restart.
Countries that shut in oil production won’t want to restart until they know there is a stable, durable strait, and that a ceasefire will last more than 30 or 60 days, said Daniel Sternoff, senior fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University.
“We don’t know what open means or what the speed of evacuation of trapped material is going to be,” he said.