Fashion
Inside the Keffe D Verdict
For all the mythic stature of Tupac Shakur, you’d have expected his murder trial to have been held somewhere with a little more grandeur. Maybe the Las Vegas Motor Speedway or the Thomas & Mack Center, a basketball and concert arena whose gala opening starred Frank Sinatra and Diana Ross. But for the last two weeks, jurors, bailiffs, members of the press, fans, and the families of Shakur and the defendant, Duane “Keffe D” Davis, packed tightly into a cramped windowless courtroom that felt barely bigger than the box of Cuban cigars that Death Row CEO Suge Knight loved to smoke.
For 30 years, the killing of 2Pac has occupied the same American conspiratorial headspace as the Malcolm X assassination, Elvis sightings, and Roswell — a mystery that bred its own industrial complex, complete with fake death theories and amateur numerologists. Then, in September 2023, a Clark County grand jury indicted Davis, a reputed shot caller for the South Side Compton Crips, for murder with a deadly weapon.
The state alleged that Davis obtained and handed off a .40-caliber Glock to his nephew, Orlando Anderson, who prosecutors say fired the fatal shots that killed the 25-year-old rapper just off the Las Vegas Strip on Sept. 7, 1996. Their theory of the case was Occam’s Razor simple: a revenge slaying that occurred roughly two and a half hours after Shakur, Knight, and some of their Death Row henchmen stomped out Anderson following a Mike Tyson fight at the MGM Grand.
Most of the evidence heard by the jury came from Davis himself — including a secretly recorded 2008 proffer agreement given to a federal task force, a subsequent interview with a Las Vegas Metro homicide detective, appearances on pay-to-play podcasts and BET’s Death Row Chronicles docuseries, and his own book, Compton Street Legend.
The defense denied the allegations, claiming that Davis was a serial fabulist seeking to entertain and profit off long-standing rumors connecting him to the case. The state was unable to produce the murder weapon, the identity of whoever rented the white Cadillac that witnesses say fired on Shakur, or any tangible documentation that Davis was in Las Vegas the night of the murder. During opening statements, defense attorney Michael Sanft summed up his case on a single PowerPoint slide: my client is just a “bullshitter.”
During the trial, the easily understood cause-and-effect theory of the killing became entangled in the labyrinth that has characterized the last 30 years of whodunit theories: there were allegations of a role played by Bad Boy CEO Sean “Diddy” Combs in the murder, accusations of law enforcement corruption, the interconnectedness with the 1997 homicide of Christopher “The Notorious B.I.G.” Wallace, and enough far-fetched speculation to give even Candace Owens pause.
The trial was far more than a series of witnesses assembled to prove who killed 2Pac. It doubled as a history of Compton gang life and the story of the Death Row and Bad Boy beef. It was an indictment of hip-hop’s warped, symbiotic relationship with the media and an explanation of why it took law enforcement nearly three decades to make an arrest. This was no gangsta rap Nuremberg, but rather something closer to the trial of Adolf Eichmann — a case tried decades later in which the aging defendant wasn’t the actual killer but a banal middleman, a functionary and a lethal node of transport.
It all leads to this moment in courtroom 12B. After barely two hours of deliberation, the jury reaches a verdict, causing the defendant and Shakur’s families to rush back to the twelfth floor. A bailiff politely instructs the 2Pac acolytes who have flocked from across the country in search of long-deferred justice:
“We have to treat this as a really reverent thing. Be calm, quiet, and respectful,” says the burly marshal wearing a baseball cap and pointed gray goatee. “This is a big day, we know.”
The defendant and his attorney, Michael Sanft, wrap arms around one another, whispering a few final thoughts before the moment of judgment. The prosecutors, Marc DiGiacomo and Binu Palal, seem loose, confident that the speed of the jury’s decision is evidence in their favor. A couple of audience members nervously crack jokes to break the tension, but no one laughs. And when the creaky door opens to allow in the jury members, everyone snaps back in their seats.
The room grows as silent as this whirling slot machine of a city can get. A jury foreman passes the verdict to Judge Carli Kierny.
Most of Shakur’s surviving family stare intensely ahead — including his sister Sekyiwa, his stepbrother and collaborator, Mopreme Shakur, and his extended clan. The judge tells Davis, 63 years old, to stand up to receive the verdict. Facing life imprisonment, he flashes a somber glower toward the judge, his hangdog facial features drooping even heavier.
Kierny informs him of his fate:
“We the jury find the defendant Duane Keith Davis as follows — Count One. Murder with the use of a deadly weapon. Guilty.”
Shakur’s sister fights back tears. A relative next to her offers a box of tissues and she dries her eyes. In the first row, his family holds each other’s hands tightly, remaining silent but visibly filled with gratitude.
On the other side of the bench, Davis’ son remains stoic, but closes his eyes, leaning against the uncomfortable cloth seats, devastated at the prospect of losing his father to the penitentiary system.
For a few seconds, the courtroom grows completely quiet. No visible joy, no exaltation, no loud weeping. Then Davis is escorted out, raising his fist to his son and the rest of the gallery. The prosecutors hug Shakur’s family, who can finally exhale. His sister continues to weep. One of his cousins raises a fist in triumph as everyone files out, completely stunned that this day actually arrived. There is nothing to celebrate, merely a tremendous sigh of relief.
* * *
The questions were the same for three decades. What really happened to Shakur on that snake-eyed night in Las Vegas? And how was it possible that law enforcement never charged anyone for the crime despite decades of credible-seeming rumors and outright admissions?
No one stated the paradox more succinctly than Chris Rock: “2Pac was gunned down on the Las Vegas Strip after a Mike Tyson fight. How many witnesses do you need to see some shit before you arrest somebody? More people saw 2Pac get shot than the last episode of Seinfeld.”
The trial played out like a crash course in the Bad Boy and Death Row feud that preceded the violence in Las Vegas, as well as the retaliatory Compton gang war that followed Shakur’s death. The state’s final witness, former Compton gang unit detective Robert Ladd, described the carnage as “ten days of hell,” where three were killed and ten more wounded.
Some of the next-to-last moments of Shakur’s life were exhibited to the jury inside this 19-story, pink sandstone and glass fortress downtown — its walls etched with quotes from Margaret Thatcher and St. Augustine about the importance of personal responsibility and hearing the other side. In these clips, Shakur celebrates in the backstage arteries of the MGM’s Grand Garden arena directly after Tyson’s victory over Bruce Seldon. He throws mini-uppercuts. His shirt is almost fully unbuttoned, chain dangling, looking for a target to direct his adrenaline rush. It’s Sept. 7, 1996. He’s 25 years old. Out on bail. For all the morbid premonitions of his music, he appears untouchable.
We next spot the multi-platinum superstar as a jumbled blur on surveillance cameras: Shakur punches and tackles Anderson, better known as “Baby Lane” within his faction of the Crips. Joined by his crew, Shakur stomps him out before the stunned gamblers and boxing fans. Then, a horde of onlookers zombie-stagger after Shakur and Knight, out of the casino, toward Las Vegas Boulevard. In open court, everyone watches this grainy security footage like the Zapruder film.
The MGM fight was said to be the result of one of Shakur and Knight’s entourage members pointing out Anderson, a Crip rival, who’d allegedly stolen a Death Row chain from him in a fight in Lakewood a few months earlier. The inciting incident behind the murder of one of the greatest rappers of all time very well might have been triggered by an ostensibly insignificant brawl at a mall Foot Locker. But no police reports were written at the time. No employees offered testimony. The only living witness to that day who took the stand, an ex-South Side Compton Crip named Devonta “Dirt Rock” Lee, was subpoenaed and forced to testify upon threat of being held in contempt of court.
Wearing a gray designer t-shirt and a pair of dangling gold Jesus pieces, Lee looked like a colonoscopy would’ve been less invasive. Nonetheless, he corroborated the basic details of the mayhem: the disrespect the chain snatching meant to Death Row, the fight that got so out of hand that the Foot Locker had to be remodeled, and the looming violence fulfilled in Las Vegas.
About a year before Shakur’s murder, Knight declared war from the podium of the 1995 Source Awards, mocking an unnamed executive producer (obviously Combs) for being “all in the videos, all on the records…dancing.” In his own speech at the New York awards show, Combs attempted to make peace, but in September 1995, one of Knight’s close Compton friends and bodyguards, Jake Robles, was shot and killed at an Atlanta nightclub.
According to the testimony of Reggie Wright Jr., the ex-head of Death Row security and a fixture in three decades of competing theories about Shakur’s death, “the story that was told to us” was that someone in Bad Boy was associated with his murder. A few weeks later, Knight bailed Shakur out of a New York State prison, pending his appeal on a first-degree sexual abuse conviction. Suspicious that the Notorious B.I.G. and Combs had set him up to be shot in 1994, Shakur began eviscerating Bad Boy, too. This was around the same time that Combs put a bounty on Knight and Shakur’s heads, according to Keffe D’s original statements to detectives.
“He said that he’d give anything for these guys’ heads,” Davis said in a recording that was played for the jury in its entirety.
Combs allegedly declared this in an Anaheim hotel suite after a Bad Boy concert, in front of then-CEO of Motown, Andre Harrell, and about 40 members of the South Side Compton Crips. Keffe D claimed that Combs was “scared to death” of the “Big CEO” (Knight), and had enlisted the Crips to protect him on his West Coast trips.
By the spring of 1996, tensions between the two labels and their gang member praetorian guards escalated to the point where a Crip tasked to protect Combs allegedly pulled out a gun on Death Row after the 1996 Soul Train Awards. Wright Jr. corroborated it. Then about three months before his murder, Shakur dropped “Hit ‘Em Up,” a scorched earth diss song that opens with him bragging about sleeping with Biggie’s wife.
Shortly thereafter, Keffe D said that Combs summoned him to a late night rendezvous at Greenblatt’s Deli on the Sunset Strip, where the hot-headed impresario reaffirmed his desire to eliminate Knight and Pac.
“I took him downstairs and he’s like, ‘Man, I got to get rid of them dudes, man. They going to be a problem,” Keffe D said in a recording played in court.
“After that “Hit ‘Em Up” came out,” he continued. “Yeah, that pissed them off.”
The investigators attempted to have Davis clarify:
“So he’s like, ‘kill both them?”
“Yeah.”
According to Davis, Combs offered a million-dollar reward. He accepted and joked in his statement to investigators that he would’ve happily had them whacked for $50,000. Over the years, Combs has repeatedly denied these accusations.
The jury heard Davis tell the story over and over, across three decades, and none of the versions entirely aligned.
The first came in 1998, after a federal drug arrest that sent him to prison for five and a half years. Interviewed by authorities, Davis denied any knowledge or connection to Shakur’s killing. The statement wasn’t recorded but reached the jury through testimony from former federal agent Wade Lee. In this version of events, Davis, Anderson, and their girlfriends returned to the Excalibur after the fight at the MGM; he theorized that the culprits may have been Compton police officers working for Death Row.
The second came a decade later. In 2008, a federal task force working the Notorious B.I.G. murder ensnared Davis in a narcotics case. Facing the prospect of dying in prison, he told investigators he had something that would “blow their fucking mind.”
In his statement to a Las Vegas homicide detective, Davis described meeting up in the MGM parking lot with Eric “Von Zip” Martin, the main conduit between him and Combs. The late narcotics kingpin and Harlem entrepreneur was so close to Bad Boy that Biggie Smalls named Martin his son’s “godfather” and Combs frequently referred to him as “uncle.” And in Vegas, Davis claimed that Martin told him that now was the “perfect time” to “handle business,” right before handing him the Glock that supposedly killed Shakur.
In this retelling, Davis sat shotgun in a white Cadillac alongside three other associates from the South Side Crips, including his nephew, Anderson. After lying in wait at Knight’s club, where Shakur was supposed to perform, Davis says that they got frustrated and decided to leave. But right as they left, they spotted Shakur and Knight stalled at the intersection of East Flamingo Road and Koval Lane, their presence announced by a carful of girls screaming “2Pac!!” (one of the women refuted this characterization in court).
It was then that Davis claimed that he pulled out the .40-caliber Glock and passed it to the backseat for someone to take aim. In some interviews, Davis was cagey and refused to name the shooter. In others, he stated that Anderson delivered the four fatal shots into Knight’s 750-series BMW. In one statement, Davis admitted that he would’ve been willing to shoot had the Cadillac approached from a different angle. Then he diagrammed their getaway. The gun was never found. He claimed they parked the rental car at a nearby hotel and hid it atop one of the tires. When they returned the next morning it was gone.
The money was never delivered. According to Keffe D’s proffer and subsequent retellings, Martin accepted a half-million from Combs—half the work completed—but never passed it along.
Back in Compton, about three weeks after Shakur’s murder, more than 300 officers drawn from 11 agencies raided 38 residences, seizing a fantastic quantity of rifles, handguns, and machine pistols, $17,000 in cash, and two pounds each of coke, meth, and weed. Twenty-three arrests were made, including Anderson. But no one was willing to talk about the crime that most interested them. Anderson was set free. About 18 months later, he was murdered in Compton over a money dispute, unrelated to Shakur’s murder. He was 23 years old.
After returning home from his penitentiary sentence in the mid-00s, Davis says that he made multiple attempts to reach out to Combs. None of the phone calls were returned.
“I hate the day I met Puff. He destroyed my life,” Davis said in his BET interview played before the jury. “Now he’s super rich. That motherfucker ain’t even send me a pair of Sean John drawers.”
* * *
By any standard, it was a surreal trial. The murder happened when technology was a quirky novelty, not a permanent shadow. There were no cell phone records to place Davis in Las Vegas. Neither DNA nor fingerprints nor hotel or credit card receipts. No iPhone footage of the attack to replay in gruesome slow motion. Except for Davis, everyone who rode in that white Cadillac is dead—the next-to-last survivor, driver Terrence “Bubble Up” Brown, was shot in 2015 at a Compton marijuana dispensary. The only other witness who could identify the shooter is Knight, and you would’ve had a better chance of Shakur walking into the courthouse than Knight swearing to tell the whole truth. There were corroborating witnesses and a little bit of circumstantial evidence, but the verdict hinged upon one man’s repeated admissions of guilt.
The trial was a trail of the dead — a roll call of minor players, long deceased, mentioned in an offhand fragment of testimony. Men whose colorful nicknames once carried weight, lost in practically forgotten street wars only to briefly materialize and quickly vanish: Buntry, Bubble Up, Hen Dog, Big Jake, Heron, Monk.
What the streets couldn’t accomplish, the ravages of age, disease, and stress finished off. In 2012, cancer took Zip Martin. The following year, “Big Frank” Alexander, the bodyguard tasked to protect Shakur in Las Vegas, committed suicide. Russell Poole, the LAPD detective, the first cop to openly link the two murders, is gone. So is Tim “Blondie” Brennan, the Compton gang unit detective, whose old investigative partner, Robert Ladd, openly mourned his friend on the witness stand. Even the original coroner is dead.
It was as much about what and who didn’t appear in court as what did. Despite the best efforts of prosecutors Marc DiGiacomo and Binu Palal, several potential witnesses vanished without a trace. Everyone from former mayor Oscar Goodman to members of the Shakur family, Knight to the current governor of Nevada, Joe Lombardo, popped up on the potential witness list, but nearly all the prominent names weren’t called. None of the truly creative conspiracy theories were litigated for a jury to decide. There were no revelations about FBI surveillance or any proof that Shakur actually absconded to Cuba.
The closest it came was when Leonard Jefferson, the photographer who took Shakur’s famous last photo, described the shooting and the chaos after.
The prosecution asked about the conspiracy theories that metastasized around his photo.
“They said it was a set…A movie scene…The internet does what it does,” Jefferson said, noting that he now works in the film industry as a location art coordinator.
“And did you stage the scene?” the prosecution inquired.
“I did not.”
One of the defense’s chief strategies was to cast doubt on the accuracy of the investigation because the lead Metro detective, Cliff Mogg, took years to file an official police report. But the retired investigator never took the stand. Neither did retired LAPD detective Greg Kading, whose work on the federal task force is widely regarded as having broken open the case.
Before the trial began, Sanft seriously weighed whether to have Davis testify, but presumably, he decided it wasn’t worth the risk. The defense only lasted about half an afternoon. A pair of Metro police officers, working overtime outside of Knight’s house on the night of the murder, testified to seeing a white Cadillac enter and exit the premises. But they couldn’t identify any of the occupants.
The final defense witness was LVMPD homicide detective Dan Long, who described his 2009 interview with Davis, his inability to corroborate any new information about the case, and his failure to obtain an arrest warrant. The DA told him at the time that Davis’ proffer agreement would’ve made it almost impossible for his testimony to be admitted into evidence. It would take Davis another decade of getting paid to tell his story for a judge to let a jury hear it.
Most witnesses were only there to corroborate largely agreed-upon facts. The jury heard from a bike cop who pulled over Knight and Shakur, roughly ten minutes before the shooting. The double-chinned retiree with wispy white hair told the jury that his conversation with Knight was very congenial.
After the attack, the officer rushed to the crime scene and rode with Shakur to the hospital. At several points, he pressed him to identify the assailants. Shakur refused, pointedly repeating, “No, we’ll take care of it.”
One of the original Vegas homicide detectives described the impossibility of getting any worthwhile information from Knight circa ’96.
“I thought he lied to us,” the retired officer said. “He said he didn’t know anything. He couldn’t recognize anybody.”
The only member of Shakur’s camp who testified to witnessing the shooting was his longtime collaborator, Malcolm Greenidge — better known as E.D.I. Mean of The Outlawz. Unable to identify the assailant in the white Cadillac, Greenidge was one of the first to reach Shakur after the shooting. Bleeding heavily, Shakur warned him: “Get down, they’re going to shoot you!!”
Greenidge turned around to see a police shotgun pointed at his head.
* * *
For a rapper as incendiary and provocative as 2Pac, the witnesses and cross-examinations were largely polite and mild-mannered. The lone exceptions arrived on the second day of trial, when the state called two men who worked security for Death Row, Wright Jr. and James “Mob James” McDonald, both of whom were in Vegas that night.
In addition to Knight and Davis, Wright Jr. has long been a person of interest connected to Shakur’s murder. But despite thirty years of allegations from detectives — both professional and YouTube-only — nothing ever stuck. On the stand, Wright Jr. was slick and well-rehearsed, defending himself against the security lapses became unforgivable in the aftermath of Shakur’s shooting.
“If I knew there was going to be the issue that would’ve happened—of course, I would’ve [assigned more security to Shakur],” Wright Jr. said, wearing head-to-toe khaki, his goatee fully grey.
He testified atop a motorized electric scooter, the result of a near-fatal 2020 bout of COVID.
In the hours after the shooting, Wright, 60, said he called his father, who headed up the Compton police’s gang division, to tell him what had happened—and to expect a war between the Death Row connected Piru Bloods and Davis and Anderson’s South Side Crips.
Finally, prosecutors asked him point blank:
“Did you have anything to do with the murder of 2Pac?”
“Absolutely not.”
The defense tried to trip Wright up over his ethical complications and criminal record — a year and a half in federal prison for money laundering and marijuana sales. He told the jury that he’d done ten interviews in the last twelve months, raking in about $2,500 per appearance.
“At some point you instructed Keffe D that he could actually make money doing that YouTube stuff?” the defense asked.
“I did pass [Keffe D’s] number on to a few YouTube channels,” Wright, an inveterate podcast guest and sometime host, responded. “After he and I had this discussion about doing something on my channel. But I refused to pay him, I’m not giving [money to] someone who I believe is 2Pac’s killer.”
The most virally shared testimony came from an ex–Death Row enforcer named James “Mob James” McDonald, who insisted that he be treated as a “hostile witness.” Thirty years ago, McDonald instilled terror into his enemies. Today, he looks like just another respectable grandfather attempting to repent for the wayward errors of his youth. He wore a flannel shirt and glasses. His beard is salt-and-pepper, his scalp is completely bald. If you didn’t know any better, you might think he was a genial pastor.
If Wright Jr. seemed a little too polished to be entirely trusted, McDonald seemed unimpeachable. He swore to tell the truth with a caveat. He was up here against his will, unwilling to go to jail for contempt, and too old to uproot his grandkids somewhere nobody could find them.
“2Pac inherited the beef from Suge and Puffy. Some of us fell victim to it. We allowed ourselves to be a part of the issue,” McDonald said on the stand. “That was a situation between record companies, not gangs. Technically, it wasn’t our business. But when you have young men fresh out of prison who didn’t get the things they wanted, getting a paycheck from Suge — they’ll do anything.”
When the prosecution asked about the tensions between Bad Boy and Death Row, Mob James blurted out, “ARE YOU SERIOUS?”
The courtroom howled.
The morning after Shakur’s shooting, Mob James said he returned to Compton, to “protect the home front.” Without outright agreeing to the prosecution’s thesis, he implicitly supported it.
“The other side was prepared to do things because Orlando [Anderson] got beat up, and that’s something you don’t tolerate,” he said. “You’re going to get repercussions from that.”
“Did it appear to you in any way that Reggie Wright was coordinating the murder of 2Pac?” Mob James was asked.
“Impossible,” he said with conviction. “If Reggie killed 2Pac, then Death Row is over with. He was the money source. He was that guy at Death Row. Reggie would’ve had a problem if he did, and I believe Knight would’ve opened his mouth and said something [had he done] that.”
During his cross-examination, the pain became obvious in McDonald’s grimace. He told the room that bringing up the dead is wrong. He cryptically alluded to things that “people ain’t talked about in thirty years. And today ain’t one of them.” He responded wearily, a man court-ordered to rehash the worst moments of his life.
Finally, when the defense kept pushing him to go deeper into the conflict that culminated in Shakur’s murder, James exploded:
“You’re asking me a question I can’t answer,” he said. “I don’t want to send him to prison, even though we don’t like each other. I don’t want to send you to prison.”
He looked straight ahead at Keffe D, longtime rivals from the streets of Compton ignominiously meeting one last time.
“I changed my life. I’m raising my grandkids and telling them never to be like [their] grandfather,” James continued. “You’re asking me questions that could hurt [Davis], and I’m not trying to do that.”
The defense kept prodding James to tell more about the Compton gang war, the hatred between both sides, what really happened on that night in Las Vegas.
“You can’t tell me, as a grown man, what I’m about to do out here,” James said, shaking his head, his old venom returning. Then he pointed at Davis’ lawyer and exclaimed:
“I’m not going to send him to prison. You are!”
* * *
Perhaps the most haunting moments of the trial came from still images. The original medical examiner is dead, so the replacement, Lisa Gavin, examined slides of Shakur’s bloated cadaver with the dispassion of a science teacher dissecting a frog. His corpse was luridly blown up on a projector, streaming live on the Law&Crime YouTube channel, naked and dead. She used a mouse to highlight his non-fatal and fatal wounds. First, the permanent scars that remained from his original shooting at New York’s Quad Studios in ‘94. Then, the fatal bullets that tore through his chest and abdomen, and the fragments that surgeons removed from his intestines.
When a prosecutor asked why the body was so swollen, the pathologist explained that six days of life support left his blood and lymphatic fluids unable to circulate; the vessels seeped into the surrounding tissues. Trickles of blood streamed from his lips and nose. Chest tubes were still attached.
Gavin told the jury about Shakur being unresponsive and unable to breathe, how one of the bullets collapsed his lung, how the doctors were forced to remove it. On the screen, the room glimpsed stitches from the emergency operations, the mold and pus infecting him, the brutal anti-glamour of a homicide victim. No glory. Just the unyielding betrayals of the flesh and the numbing sense that none of this had to happen.
On most trial days, Shakur’s relatives watched from the gallery. Most left during the viewing of the body. A cousin, Zayd Akinyela, remained and told the AP that he wanted to stay for closure. Nonetheless, it made him “very angry, very angry, to say the least, very sad.”
To see Shakur stripped of his vitality seemed like a secondary crime. All the bombast and charisma of the music and the persona were made to feel depressingly small. Only two months before the murder, he had walked the runway at Milan Men’s Fashion Week, the first rapper ever to do so; Gianni Versace was said to have called him the most beautiful man in the world. He was somewhere between rap’s James Dean and Jim Morrison, forever suspended at an empyrean peak, spared the graceless fumbles that await us all with age.
There were never any whispers about Biggie remaining alive. Part of it was the circumstances of his death and the mournful public procession through Brooklyn. But the very nature of Christopher Wallace’s slow-moving, Jovian physique made his body seem like a burden. His existence always seemed provisional; his album titles: Ready to Die, Life After Death. He was 24 when he was murdered, and already walking with a cane.
In contrast, 2Pac was a nuclear missile, the scion of Black Panther royalty, who moved with speed and intensity, ostensibly beholden to none of the rules that restrain the rest of the earthbound. You couldn’t imagine him dead because he seemed like a superhero, coated in adamantium, full of bile, iron, and blood. He demanded that we picture him rolling, and that’s how he’s best remembered. But Newton’s first law has never lost: an object in motion will always stay in motion with the same speed unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
* * *
If there was a point to arresting a grandfather old enough to collect Social Security and trying him three decades later for plotting to kill a beloved icon, it was to provide a reckoning. It was to put an end to the speculation and media exploitation — a long-delayed dose of antibiotics administered to a festering and ancient wound. But the conjecture is a permanent business model.
We prefer exciting “revelations” to dull truths. And after all this time, it’s too anticlimactic for most people to believe that Shakur died in a garden-variety gang murder. Nonetheless, twelve jurors decided that Davis was telling the truth in his admissions to law enforcement. A robbery of a Death Row chain at a Foot Locker led to a melee in a Las Vegas casino, which sparked a revenge plot enacted only a couple hours later. Davis will be sentenced on Oct. 13.
Even some of the most heavily invested in the case don’t seem to entirely believe the conclusion. Last week, Knight called in to TMZ from the RJ Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, where he’s less than halfway through a 28-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter. According to the former CEO of Death Row, defense lawyers offered him a million dollars to take the stand and say that Davis wasn’t in the white Cadillac that night. Sanft denied it, and told reporters that he had taken the case pro bono.
“I feel sort of sad for him. I’m not saying he’s guilty or innocent. That man is on trial fighting for his life. And it’s sad that the police who was involved did what they was supposed to do, for the other people,” Knight said, adding that “crooked cops” and off-duty officers are “1,000 percent” behind 2Pac’s murder. “There was definitely more than one person involved. The people who got their hands in it is trying to muddy the waters.”
If you can untangle what Suge is saying, it sounds like he’s trying to make the case that Keffe D is just a patsy à la Lee Harvey Oswald, an easy decoy to absorb the blame, and deflect from a nefarious plot that would ensnare people at the highest levels of power, should it ever be exposed.
Even 2Pac’s own biological father rejected the court’s decision. On his Facebook page, William Garland wrote that the “prosecutor presented questionable policemen, some corrupt some not…questionable individuals who made money off of the miss representation [sic] of the truth with documentary’s [sic] and books of lies…snitches and gang bangers and that’s all….WHERE’S THE TRUTH WHERE’S JUSTICE? Some say in [sic] died it the hospital that Friday September 13, 1996 and all we have left is theater, speculation, lies, and bullshit welcome to the cover up of a trial that creates more questions than answers Tupac deserves better, his followers and his family deserve better.”
That could be too much to ask for these days. Nonetheless, in the hallway outside of the courtroom, Shakur’s family exchanges hugs, happily shaking their heads that at least some of the darkness and ambiguity surrounding the murder has been lifted. Still in disbelief, they high-five and repeat, “30 years.” One of his cousins nods and says, “those prosecutors went hard to bring the case back!”
On the elevator down to the ground floor, a close friend of Shakur’s family comments, “it feels like a giant knot has been untied.” Several nod their heads in assent. Closure may be impossible, and the full truth of what happened on the night of Sept. 7, 1996 will likely never be known. Even when the system works correctly, we have lost our collective ability to believe in it. But there is finally a verdict.
Fashion
Jack O’Connell, Guy Pearce in Danny Boyle Murdoch Drama
Ink, a play by James Graham, premiered in London and then moved to Broadway in 2018. Director Rupert Goold gave the dramatic piece a roller-coaster pace, lavish musical flourishes, and low-brow humor. Danny Boyle uses a similar approach with his snazzy adaptation of the play Ink, which is infused with convulsive edits, kinetic energy and liberal amounts of electro-pop, indie-rock and post-punk. The anti-establishment approach is visually appealing and enjoyable, even though the morality play has an unclear point of view.
Graham doesn’t try to pretend that he is anything other than a true storyteller. Graham, who also wrote the adaptation, doesn’t pretend otherwise. He simply presents the historical facts through a captivating narrative that spans the late 1960s and 1980s. It would have been a docudrama without the brilliant work by Boyle – this is unquestionably a film made by the same man as Trainspotting – and the ace cast led Jack O’Connell Guy Pearce Claire Foy.
This film is an inventive and irreverent recap of Rupert Murdoch’s (Pearce), the British media titan, launching a game-changing assault on London Fleet Street in 1969. The Australian media giant enlisted Larry Lamb, a Yorkshireman with working-class roots, to be editor of The Sun. He was given the mandate to transform the newspaper from a failing broadsheet into a tabloid. The content had to change, too, and become more populist, scandalous, and sensationalist.
The movie, just as in the play, treats the transition and subsequent rise of the Sun, which became the most popular daily in the United States in less than ten years, as an outrageous caper in which Murdoch, a Mephistophelean, seduces Lamb to a Faustian deal that sees him gradually surpass his employer with ruthless bottom-line-driven behavior.
Boyle’s and Fin Oates’ adrenaline-charged montages point out explicitly the radical change of these years — the dumbing-down and vulgarization in news culture. This was a crucial step to today’s clickbait, post-truth age where any social media mouthpiece could turn biased opinions into accepted facts with just enough amplification. This applies to anyone, from conspiracy theorists and presidents alike.
It doesn’t let Murdoch completely off the hook, but the film is kinder to him. The Sun owner will be more cautious than his headstrong assistant when ethics are raised. This could leave a bad taste in people’s mouths who believe Fox News, and other outlets like it, were instrumental in bringing the right to power. Maybe cynical days demand cynical distance. There’s no doubt that filmmakers should trust their audiences to make conclusions about this historical drama and the way it relates to 21st-century information dissemination.
Boyle’s quick cuts show the machinery and manpower that makes the newspaper industry hum.
Pearce’s performance is both low-key funny and intimidating, as the businessman who has no doubts about himself. He peppers his conversations with colourful Australianisms and swear words while maintaining a laser-like focus. O’Connell’s reaction is largely reactive, as Larry initially seems sceptical about Rupert’s goals and is reluctant to appear too enthusiastic. He becomes more tenacious after settling into the office of the editor. A bulldog who is not as willing to accept no for an explanation than his boss.
Murdoch has thick skin and is used to being undervalued by condescending Brits who view him as an intrusive interloper. Lamb is also an outsider, having worked as a Subeditor for The Daily Mirror, but became impatient when he saw his chances of promotion diminish under the stuffy Hugh Cudlipp, played by Bertie Carvel who received both an Olivier Award as well as a Tony Award for his role as Murdoch.
Larry is a man who is eager to get revenge on the people that have held him back. While the success of the newspaper is Rupert’s primary objective, he isn’t opposed to his desire to do so.
Recruitment is a fast and entertaining process. The majority of the new hires are poached directly from Mirror. Meetings take place in a variety of places, from steam rooms to pool halls to Soho’s porn theatres. The majority of writers and editors initially reject the idea that they would defect to Rupert’s “shitsheet” until salary and promotion convince them otherwise.
More so than in the play, the new crew are given distinct character outlines, from plain-spoken news editor Brian (Brian Gleeson) through rough-around-the-edges sports editor Frank (Christopher Fulford) to posh deputy editor Patrick (Bernard Shrimsley), the most resistant of them to the sweeping changes Larry proposes. The staff struggles to answer the question “What is exactly a Sun Story?” even after key positions have been filled.
Jules Foy is the only significant holdout in Larry’s wishlist for the masthead. He eventually convinces her to come over by offering her a page dedicated exclusively to women’s concerns, which she would never be able get at her current job with The Mirror. Larry is also married with a child, but it doesn’t stop them from having an affair.
Jules is a composite character that’s more developed and satisfying than the stage version, giving Foy great material to work with. It’s a working class woman who isn’t interested in filling her columns with fluff like recipes and needlework. Her drive and confidence are no less than Larry’s. She agrees to the idea of running The Sensuous Woman in multiple installments, a book that no British publisher would have touched at the time. This series has been credited for bringing a greater openness to female sexuality in Britain.
Larry asks his staff what they want to see on the Sun pages. Ray (Blake Harrison), chief subeditor, replies, “I love women…boobs, and bums.” Jules agrees to the inclusion of “tasteful,” scantily-clad photos, but she is reluctant when Larry wants to go one step further by introducing the tabloid’s notorious “page three girls.”
Scenes between Murdoch, Lamb and their editors are the ones that spark the most controversy. The tension increases when an editor begins to operate according to his rules. Rupert calls the first issue “a cheap version of the Mirror” and is not happy with it. But Larry being humiliated by Cudlipp in public at the Press Council Awards gives him the motivation to remove his gloves.
Larry’s decision to cover the Murdoch company’s British expansion with the Sun and the abduction of Muriel (Lucy Russell), the wife of Murdoch senior executive Alick (Jonathan Hyde) who had both relocated from Australia, causes a major conflict. Lamb’s editorial decisions are controversial and cause friction between Jules and Rupert as well as the workers who operate the printing press and Scotland Yard.
Ink, which opens Dec. 11, in the U.S. but will be available on Netflix starting Jan. 8, is in many respects a story of rise and fall. O’Connell plays it with a fierce determination without being maniacal. It is also an account of how news reports have degraded. Sun employees are instructed to write up every crime, whether it be a murder or a rape. It’s also a wonderful evocation for those who miss the old newsroom.
Boyle’s cinematographer Alwin Kuchler, production and costume designer Carson McColl, and Gareth Pugh, who worked on the follow-up to Nia DaCosta’s 28 Years Later, The Bone Temple, excel in creating a sense of time and place. The visuals are given a grainy, halftoned look when they mimic vintage newspaper.
It is easy to see how Daniel Pemberton’s rousing score blends seamlessly with Boyle’s usual punchy selections. The staffing openings set to Sprints ‘Something Gonna happen’ or the Sun launching to IDLES ‘The New Sensation’ recalls the visceral impact of Iggy Pop’s ‘Lust for Life’ over Ewan MacGregor’s ‘Choose Life’ monologue from the Trainspotting opener.
Danny Boyle is the perfect choice to inject a sense of urgency into a talky film.
Fashion
EU and Nato vow to step up pressure on Russia after ‘new escalation’ in Leipzig
EU and Nato promise to increase pressure on Russia following a ‘new escalated’ situation in Germany
Heads of Nato, the European Commission and NATO have all warned about Russia’s increasing recklessness and promised to react to this “new normal”.
Ursula von der Leyen said that “Leipzig represents a new level of aggression on European Union territory directly attributable to Russia” a day following Germany’s accusation against Russia over a drone attack on Leipzig Airport last month.
Von der Leyen stated that “we have to step-up and this means we must be ready to react faster to Russia’s recklessness.” Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, said that the entire alliance, including the US, was “in complete solidarity with Germany”.
Russia rejects German allegations that an explosive-laden drone deliberately targeted a Ukrainian freight plane on the 4th of August.
A robot defused the drone at Leipzig/Halle Airport and it is believed that a second drone collided into another cargo aircraft.
Ten days later, a third drone had been found at the airport. This is a Nato hub that is frequently used by Ukrainian Antonov transport planes.
The German government only confirmed on Tuesday that Russia is behind these incidents after a thorough investigation by police and intelligence.
Interior Minister said the configuration of drone, its components, explosives, and detonator are all familiar from Russian hybrid operations.
According to reports, two suspects were identified as being involved in the Leipzig terrorist attack. One was a Belarusian who had a Russian visa and entered the country on a tourism visa. The other, who held Latvian and Russian nationality, arrived in Berlin by plane and left the city just two days prior to the attempted attack.
Berlin announced that it would close both the Russian Consulate in Bonn and the Russian House Cultural Institution, which was widely believed in Berlin to be a Kremlin propaganda outlet.
Russian Foreign Ministry promised to reply in a “mirror image” manner and claimed Berlin has not provided any evidence to support its claims. Bernd Finke, Germany’s charge-d’affaires Bernd Finke has been summoned by Moscow to hear Moscow reject Berlin’s “totally unfounded allegations”.
Vladimir Putin condemned Germany’s actions as “clearly going against the interests of Germans”.
Alexander Grushko, Russian deputy foreign minister and former ambassador to Germany said that Moscow might be willing to cut off relations with Berlin. However, he added they were giving diplomacy some time.
The German critics said that the German response to the Russian invasion was weak. However, Berlin is working with allies on a coordinated response, which includes EU sanction extensions and restrictions on entry for Russian tourists across the EU.
Von der Leyen made it clear that “military grade material was used by Russian agents on European Union territory” in the attack at Leipzig.
She said, “We won’t tolerate it.”
While Rutte was in Brussels meeting her, EU Foreign Ministers gathered in Wicklow, Ireland. France’s Jean-Noel Barrot, the French foreign minister, said that action could be taken at an EU level to combat Russia’s “shadow fleet”, a group of oil-carrying ships and other vessels, which are avoiding EU sanctions.
Barrot, along with ministers from Belgium and The Netherlands, said that they summoned Russian Ambassadors to protest the attack.
Kestutis Budrys, Lithuania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs said that it is obvious to him that Russia sees no political costs in hybrid operations conducted against European allies.
Kaja Kallas, the EU’s foreign policy chief, said that they are working to improve enforcement of sanctions and there is broad support for a visa ban on Russian ex combatants entering Europe as well as stricter restrictions on visas for Russian tourists.
A number of EU member states, such as Sweden, Poland, Spain and the Netherlands are calling for Russia’s frozen assets worth more than EUR193bn to be released to Ukraine. The plan was originally conceived at the end 2025 and then rejected by Belgium, where the funds are held. Belgium is still adamant about its position, as it does not want to be held liable financially by courts.
Von der Leyen stated that the Leipzig attack is part of an increasing pattern of dangerous incidents including drones, and interference in critical infrastructure.
Mark Rutte said that there was an increased threat to Europeans by drones and rockets entering countries along the Alliance’s east flank. He also added that there were more “malign actions targeting our territory directly” whether they are fires started in Ukrainian factories making defence equipment or the Russian hybrid attacks in Leipzig.
In the last 24 hours, several suspected acts of sabotage were reported across Germany, including attacks against electricity substations in both the east and west, near Cologne.
The North Rhine-Westphalia interior minister Herbert Reul stated that although the authorities have not identified the perpetrators, the attack on power lines in Bergheim was intentional and the attacker was targeting the entire country.
He said: “We’re investigating two possible scenarios, sabotage by an alien state or left-wing extremeism.”
Five power plants units at two coal-fired stations went offline after several power lines broke down. Six launching devices were found by police in a nearby field.
On Tuesday morning, high-voltage lines near Brandenburg’s coal-fired Janschwalde power station were damaged. Later explosives were found in a nearby substation.
In Poland, Donald Tusk, the Prime Minister, said that a fire in a factory making combat drones, located 140km south of Warsaw, was an intentional act of arson. The arsonist is not ruled out for the fire that broke out at a Lublin factory on Sunday evening.
Fashion
30 of her best fashion looks for her 30th birthday
Zendaya is a far cry from the bright-eyed Disney star who posed in front of cameras for Justin Bieber at his Never Say Never show, wearing a lame silver blazer and vest with a patent skirt. She also wore tights, wedge boots, and a heeled bootie. This was her first Hollywood premier. While her passion for fashion came instantly, it wasn’t always an easy road. Law Roach, actor-stylist Law Roach’s designer, devised a strategy to transform her from a Disney princess into a red carpet trailblazer.
Who Wore It Best? The Who Wore It Best? column, an old-fashioned fixture of weekly glossy magazines. Roach, who dressed his client Zendaya in looks similar to those worn by celebrities – “but better,” as he put it – quickly landed her name at the top of the best section. The rising star was able to borrow looks from emerging designers, and soon big brands took notice. Roach’s goal to “help an amazing girl” show the world her potential is hard to comprehend now that Zendaya has her choice of houses.
Zendaya’s wardrobe is so erratic that the idea of having a signature style seems dated. The research that she and Roach do for each appearance in front of cameras allows her to give every moment of it all. Roach added, “We dress up and make outfits for ourselves or as a tribute to people who inspire us.
Roach told British Vogue, in April 2024, that getting done up for the step-and repeat “gave [her] this real confidence. It was like: OK, I’ll put this all on, go out and show it to the world. Then, when I get home, take it off, and be myself again.” It’s funny. She is fierce on the inside. Zendaya said that she would rather stay at home with Noon her dog and her hair down, without make-up and with no makeup, to watch a movie. She agreed. Zendaya noted that she might “regurgitate the same sweater and slacks combo” in her everyday life, whereas red carpets and shoots require full character commitment. She said that her alter-ego, a fashionista named Sasha Fierce, is a “different being” who comes to her. I have to purchase her. “I have to believe that she exists or this fantasy.”
Zendaya’s favourite books for summer reading
Fantasy can be summed up in one word. Zendaya’s standout look is a combination of science (remember her light-up Cinderella dress at the 2019 Met Gala for a true example) and welding techniques. Her Versace Met outfit the previous year was an ode modern day to A Knight’s Tale. Zendaya’s hair has undergone many transformations, from blunt bobs to waist-length braids and disco curls.
Zendaya’s red carpet record is one few can equal as she turns 30. Zendaya has moved on from architectural feats – such as the 40 metre length of LED light required to create her Cinderella dress at the 2019 Met Gala — to Matieres Fécales and archival couture. Grecian designs for The Odyssey’s press tour, if-you-know-you-know Spider-Man reference and bridal gowns from The Drama were all part of this year. (Although there is still no news on her wedding dress). She’s more casual when she is off duty. You can often see her walking their dog in Maison Margiela tabis, a trenchcoat and Tom Holland.
Zendaya’s The Odyssey Press Tour: Here are 17 looks that I would love to see her wear
Zendaya Schiaparelli was the “something blue” she chose for her latest look.
Zendaya celebrates her 30th anniversary with a look at 30 of her most iconic fashion looks.
Fashion
Allen Iverson Reacts to Naomi Osaka Honoring NBA Icon With US Open Outfit in Trending Video, Photos
Allen Iverson was impressed by Naomi Osaka’s tribute to Allen Iverson.
Wow, that’s an honor! “Big FAN cannot wait to meet with you. “@naomiosaka”, he posted on Instagram.
Osaka wore a headband, a shooting shirt, and an elbow pad in order to emulate Iverson’s look on the court.
Osaka wore the iconic Slam Magazine 1999 cover of Iverson while talking to journalists in advance of the match. She called the Hall of Fame guard a trailblazer.
She said, “I also think that he is someone I look up too, because he has done so much in the fashion world, whether on purpose or unintentionally, he changed how NBA players dress.” She said, “I think the entire conversation about clothes in sports as well as just expressing oneself through style is something that I admire in this regard.”
Iverson’s role is credited as a major factor in the NBA’s 2005 implementation of stricter dress codes. When he first arrived at the arena, he wore a casual style. However, David Stern ordered players to wear business-casual attire.
A generation of ballers, far before Osaka even took to the court, adopted Iverson’s shooting sleeve and headband. Iverson initially used the sleeve as a means of treatment for an elbow problem. He decided over time to continue wearing the sleeve.
Osaka may have gotten lucky because of the tribute. Zakharova was beaten in straight sets.
Fashion
Naomi Osaka pays tribute to NBA star Allen Iverson in basketball-themed US Open outfit
Naomi Osaka channelled former NBA player Allen Iverson ahead of her US Open First-Round victory against Anastasia Zakharova.
Osaka’s usual stylish entrance was made for the tournament opening, which she easily won. Two-time US Open winner Osaka walked onto the Arthur Ashe Stadium court in a white long skirt with a gray hooded jacket that featured newspaper clips about her.
Then she removed her hood, revealing cornrows underneath a bandana. This was Iverson’s trademark look while he played for the Philadelphia 76ers and won the NBA MVP award. Iverson’s signature look was an arm sleeve.
Osaka’s not the only Nike sponsored athlete who wore a outfit with a basketball theme at the US Open. Aryna Sablalenka, the world’s number one, is sporting an orange dress, the color of the New York Knicks who, in June, won the first NBA championship since 1973.
It’s, I suppose, my tribute for Iverson. Osaka, after winning 7-6 7-6 said: “I really like him.” Nike asked for basketball so I replied, “OK, you’d like basketball? I’ll provide basketball.”
Osaka, who praised Iverson as a fashion pioneer in her Saturday press conference with reporters, was wearing a shirt that featured Iverson’s image.
Osaka stated on Saturday that he is someone she looks up to because of his fashion sense. “Whether it was on purpose, he has changed the way NBA players dress,” Osaka added. “I think he is someone I admire in this regard, because he has done a lot in fashion. Whether it’s on purpose or not, if influenced the way that NBA players dress,” Osaka said.
She said that Iverson is someone she’s never met, but on Monday he wrote on his Instagram account: “Wow! What an honor!” Big Fan can’t Wait to Meet You.
-
Entertainment4 days agoKacey Musgraves’ Stage Catches Fire During Boston Concert
-
Business2 days agoWaymo accelerates robotaxi expansion with launches in Denver, San Diego, and Tampa
-
Entertainment2 days agoPresident Trump Calls for Federal Film and TV Tax Incentive
-
Entertainment1 day agoMiley Cyrus Announces ‘Bass Persuades’ Album, Hollywood Bowl Shows
-
Entertainment2 days agoTrump Endorses U.S. Tax Incentive to Keep Hollywood Production
-
Entertainment1 week agoDisney Knew About Rapes On 2001’s Poof Point Film, Actress Alleges
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoMelissa Gilbert On Child Actor Protections After Hayden Panettiere Death
-
Business2 weeks agoOura faces lawsuit accusing it of misleading consumers about sleep-tracking accuracy
