Food
13 Protein Bars Youll Actually Want to Eat
What we love: These bars are a great option for anyone who dislikes a typical dense protein bar. They’re crispy and light despite packing a hefty 15 grams of protein and 5 grams of fiber, and they truly do evoke that familiar lunchbox goodie. They’re available in a wide range of flavors (think Snickerdoodle, Matcha, Banana Bread, Vanilla, and Chocolate Chip), so I’d recommend picking up a variety pack if it’s your first time trying them.
What we’d leave: If whey protein powders tend to give you tummy troubles, we’d recommend steering clear of these bars.
How we tested protein bars
To test protein bars, we did what was necessary: tasted a lot of protein bars. To find those bars, we sourced recommendations from fellow BA staffers and browsed grocery store aisles to find new-to-us brands. We tried to taste multiple flavors of a given brand when possible and made notes on taste, texture, and nutritional content for each bar.
Other protein bars we like
Most protein bars resemble a large eraser made up of thick, uniform paste. Gluten-free Kind Protein Bars, on the other hand, have actual texture and crunch. They’re quite similar to the original Kind bars in taste and pearance—they’re packed full of almonds and peanuts, but they have double the amount of protein and keep you full longer thanks to 5 grams of fiber from chicory roots. The main protein supplement here is soy protein isolate, so if you have any soy sensitivities, these should be avoided.
The Perfect Bar Dark Chocolate Chip and Peanut Butter
Perfect Bar
Dark Chocolate Chip Peanut Butter Protein Bar
According to contributor Nicki Campo in her 2021 review, the Perfect Bar completely lives up to its name. Made by Perfect Snacks, it vaguely resembles a chewy candy bar and also kind of tastes like one. With a powdered blend of 20 superfoods that include things like tomato and carrot, the bar keeps things healthy with lots of vitamins and minerals that’s balanced with an addictively sweet taste reminiscent of a Reese’s peanut butter cup courtesy of some freshly ground nut butter—which Campo also calls one of the brand’s secrets to perfect texture.
Think’s High Protein bars come in 13 flavors and have an impressive 15 or 20 grams of protein depending on which one you choose—plus they’re pretty easy to find out in the wild. These ranked in the middle of the pack in our taste test—not terrible, but they have a soy-protein-forward aftertaste we didn’t love. They’re a perfectly edible option should you come across them at a gas station or grocery store.
Misfits is similar to Barebells in that their bars read like high-protein candy bars. The flavors we tried were pretty tasty, but we ultimately liked Barebells flavor, texture, and protein content more and would opt for one over a Misfits bar if given the choice.
Mush
Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Bar
You may know Mush from their single-serving overnight oats, available in flavors like Blueberry, ple Cinnamon, and Vanilla Bean in grocery stores next to the yogurt. The brand now has a line of protein bars with a similarly simple, whole-foods-focused ingredient list made up primarily of rolled oats. They’re bound with coconut oil, honey, and dates—no artificial sweeteners in sight. The protein comes from a milk protein concentrate and clocks in at a very solid 15 grams. We thoroughly enjoyed the taste and texture of these, though it is worth noting that like the brand’s other products, they need to be refrigerated. They come in three flavors: peanut butter chocolate chip, double chocolate chip, and mle cinnamon.
I was intrigued by these whey-based bars because of their incredibly short (3–5) ingredient list. They’re essentially whey protein isolate bound together by nuts and honey, and while that may sound gross, I was pleasantly surprised by the taste of these bars. That said, I wouldn’t necessarily reach for them over any of the top picks on this list—I found the flavor a bit flat and thought these could’ve benefitted from a dash of sea salt.
The best way I can describe Pure Protein bars is that they taste like a quintessential protein bar—you know, a chewy brick made up of protein and miscellaneous processed ingredients that’s relatively tasty (if very unnatural). I didn’t mind the flavor of these, but they were outperformed by the bars that made our top picks.
Food
The Best Immersion Blenders Will Save You Money and Counterspace
Braun’s 500-watt MultiQuick 7 is the Goldilocks of immersion blenders and a meal-prep MVP. It’s powerful, lightweight, has a comfortable grip, makes speed adjustments ridiculously easy, and excelled at all of the tests we put it through with no splashing and very little noise. It also comes with a number of attachments that only add to its versatility.
What we love: If we had to choose one word to describe the Braun MultiQuick 7 immersion blender, it’s easy. Everything about it makes meal-prep breezy and less of a chore. Unlike the All-Clad Corded Immersion Blender that topped this review in past years, the MultiQuick 7 is extremely lightweight and we never felt fatigued, even while performing multiple jobs in a row. The rubberized ergonomic handle provided a firm, comfortable grip as we powered through tasks, and Braun’s Easy SmartSpeed technology made switching speeds a sn: Squeeze the trigger-like control button tighter to speed things up and loosen your grip to slow things down.
The MultiQuick 7’s ActiveBlade technology, which allows the blade to move up and down during operation instead of remaining static, proved an incredible upgrade when prepping our soup and smoothies. The spinning stainless steel blade created a swirling vortex that effortlessly broke down carrots and frozen fruit without any suctioning to the bottom of the pot or the included blending container—an issue we experienced with several other models we tested.
Besides the container, the MultiQuick 7 comes with a whisk attachment, a puree attachment, and a food processor bowl. The whisk, which attached to the handle with a simple click, quickly produced a mountain of fluffy whipped cream and a creamy, perfectly emulsified aioli with no separation. It took just a few pulses of the chopper to create a he of finely chopped onions for our carrot soup (more on that below). Is the chopper better than a knife? Not necessarily, but we liked the added convenience.
What we’d leave: There really isn’t much we didn’t love about the MultiQuick 7 immersion blender; the blade and whisk both did a superior job in our tests. The chopper attachment, however, can be a little overzealous. Even though we only gave it a few pulses, our chopped onions were slightly mushy. They were fine for our carrot soup recipe, but be careful if you want more crunch in something like a salsa.
Speaking of attachments, this stick blender comes with a lot of extras and no container or bag for storing them. Immersion blenders are typically space savers, but these can actually clutter up a cabinet.
Pros:
- Affordable
- Simple design
- Ergonomic handle
- Blending jar doubles as measuring cup
Cons:
- Less powerful motor
- Requires more effort to break down hard, fibrous fruits and vegetables
Blending depth: 8″
Power: 300 watts
Power settings: 2
Attachments: Whisk attachment, measuring mixing cup
Warranty: Limited 1-year warranty
Food
Berries and Cream Mille-Feuille
Step 1
Step 2
Meanwhile, beat 8 oz. cream cheese, room temperature, 1 Tbsp. vanilla extract, 1 tsp. Diamond Crystal or ½ tsp. Morton kosher salt, and 1½ cups (165 g) powdered sugar in the bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the paddle attachment on medium speed until light, fluffy, and smooth, about 2 minutes. Scre down sides of bowl, reduce speed to low, and with motor running, slowly stream in 3 cups heavy cream. Beat, gradually increasing speed to medium-high, until medium-stiff peaks form and mixture is light and fluffy, about 2 minutes. Transfer cream mixture to a piping bag fitted with a large straight tip (or use a large resealable plastic bag with a corner cut off).
Step 3
Stir together zest and juice of 1 lemon and 1 cup strawberry jam in a small bowl.
Step 4
Place 1 sheet of pastry on a platter or clean baking sheet. Pipe a border of cream mixture around edges of pastry as desired. Spoon dollops of about half of jam mixture around, staying within border, and spread a little with an offset spatula (you won’t have enough jam to cover completely in an even layer, so no need to be that precise). Pipe a few dollops of cream mixture over jam and spread into an even layer (aim to have about half of cream mixture left). Scatter 1¼ lb. mixed fresh berries (such as strawberries, blueberries, raspberries, and/or blackberries) evenly over cream mixture. Spoon dollops of remaining jam mixture all over and gently spread as you can to create an even layer, then place second pastry sheet on top. Pipe a border of cream mixture around edges of pastry, then fill center with remaining cream mixture and spread into an even layer. Scatter remaining 1¼ lb. mixed fresh berries evenly over. Lightly dust berries with powdered sugar if desired.
Food
Can Anyone Out-Creami The Ninja Creami? I Tested the Competition To Find Out
What we love: The FastFreeze’s footprint is its biggest selling point. It’s a fraction of the size of its two competitors, making it enticing for anyone with limited counter and storage space. It makes half-pints of ice cream (whereas the Creami and the Chill both make full pints), which are optimal for solo ice cream enjoyers, and it’s the quietest and cheest machine of the bunch by far. If you’re looking to hop on the Creami trend without shelling out the big bucks or giving up a ton of precious kitchen space, I can understand why you’d consider it—but it’s worth noting that it comes with some significant drawbacks when compared to its competitors.
What we’d leave: The FastFreeze sounds great on per, but I was dispointed by its performance in testing. Did it transform frozen liquid into frozen treats? Yes, but neither the ice cream nor the sorbet I made reached a desirable consistency.
To operate the FastFreeze, you’ll need to press the power button and push down on the device until the blade has reached the bottom of the cup, and then repeat as needed. By the time my ice cream was fully processed, it was well past soft-serve consistency and started melting in minutes—plus it was quite lumpy. The sorbet (which I made by mashing fresh pineple in the cup before freezing per Cuisinart’s instructions) was much more scoopable but took several minutes of manual processing to reach a somewhat creamy consistency, and never got completely smooth. This isn’t exactly surprising—the FastFreeze’s motor is far less powerful than that of the Creami or the Chill.
Because the blade can’t be detached from its base, the FastFreeze was the most difficult model to clean. You’ll have to carefully hand-wash this part, though you can dishwash the half-pint containers.
How I tested
What I looked for
I noted how intuitive each pliance was to use and how much effort each one required of the user. Two of the three machines needed nothing more than a button press; one required manual processing throughout.
Each machine offers a range of presets for different frozen treats. I especially valued models with a dedicated mix-ins setting and a re-spin option for pints that needed more processing time.
Storage and maneuverability
No one wants to have to store a huge, heavy pliance if they can avoid it, so I took into account each model’s size and weight. Ultimately, the largest and heaviest model produced the best ice cream and sorbet, but I made sure to consider the other models’ dimensions when writing them up.
Cleaning any pliance with a blade can be tricky, so I preciated it when models were easy to disassemble and had dishwasher-safe components.
The models I tested ranged from $120 to $230, and price factored into my overall assessment.
The most important factor in my evaluation of these models was, of course, the quality of th frozen treats they produced. Was the ice cream creamy and scoopable? Were mix-ins properly distributed throughout the pint? Was the sorbet smooth and dense? I looked for models that delivered scoop shop-worthy results in both tests.
How do these machines differ from traditional ice cream makers?
There are two types of traditional ice cream makers: compressor and canister-style. Both of these work by churning an ice cream (or sorbet, or froyo) base in a freezing cold environment and feature a paddle that scres tiny ice crystals off the walls of the machine while aerating the mixture. The Creami, Chill, and FastFreeze work differently: A spinning blade pushes up and down through a cylinder of frozen liquid, shaving it into thin layers until it becomes smooth and homogenous. The process introduces less air than traditional churning, producing a denser, incredibly smooth result.
Food
25 Easy Weeknight Dinners for June
June is when weeknight cooking starts to feel a little easier. The farmers market is overflowing, the grill is back in rotation, and dinner can often come together with little more than a pile of peak-season produce and a quick-cooking protein. Whether you’re looking for easy weeknight dinners to get through a busy workweek or simple summer meals to enjoy outside on a warm evening, these recipes have you covered.
This month’s collection leans into the flavors that define early summer. We added recipes built around corn, squash, tomatoes, fresh herbs, and seafood, while retiring some of the colder-weather dishes that made more sense earlier in the spring. You’ll find quick fish tacos, weeknight-friendly salmon recipes, hearty dinner salads, cold noodles for hot nights, and pasta dishes packed with seasonal produce. There are one-pot dinners, make-ahead favorites, and plenty of recipes that come together in 30 minutes or less. From grilled steak and smash burgers to chickpea melts and vegetable-packed pasta, these June weeknight dinner ideas make the most of the season without demanding too much of your time.
Food
Heres How to Submit to BAs Pantry Awards for 2026
Thank you for your interest in the 2026 Pantry Awards. The submission window is now closed.
We will reach out via email if we have decided to move forward with sample requests.
We spend all year eating our way through the newest snacks, beverages, and pantry stles. We taste, test, and debate until we find the products we deem worth making room for in your fridge and pantry. This year, for the first time, we’re making it official: In summer 2026, we’re launching Bon pétit’s first-ever Pantry Awards.
Our editors are always on the hunt for the most delicious, most innovative new products hitting shelves. But to make sure we don’t miss anything worth tasting, we’re asking brands to submit products for consideration. How has your brand boosted pasta with nutrients? What’s the new functional ingredient you’re putting in a protein bar? We want to know. Scroll down to see which items are eligible and how to nominate them.
How to submit your product to Bon pétit’s Pantry Awards
Eligibility:
Products must have launched between January 1, 2025, and May 31, 2026. They should be available for purchase in the United States upon submission.
Process and timeline:
Submissions are due by May 31, 2026. Multiple flavors of single product lines should be submitted in one form.
Samples should be available for editors to test by June 1, 2026. We will contact you directly if we’d like to test your product. We ask that brands not send unsolicited products ahead of our outreach; samples sent without request may not be reviewed.
Pantry Awards will launch in summer 2026.
Categories for consideration:
- Snacks (e.g. chips, crackers, popcorn, pretzels)
- Condiments and sauces (e.g. hot sauce, pasta sauce, spreads, dressings)
- Pantry stles (e.g. oils, pasta, grains, canned goods, spices)
- Sweets (e.g. chocolate, candy, baked goods)
- Drinks (nonalcoholic only)
Editor’s note: If your product does not fit exactly into one of these categories, please feel free to submit anyway, and we will determine whether it qualifies for consideration after reviewing your submission. We are accepting perishable and frozen products.
