BBC News World
Sources claim that Donald Trump has no problem with the new chief of intel. He is a partisan who is well-liked by the president. Subscribe to read the story without ads
Get access to unlimited adfree articles and exclusive content. Bill Pulte is the chief housing regulator for the Trump administration and will take over the role of acting director of National Intelligence by the end this month. He has Trump’s ear and shares his urgency. Pulte is a frequent visitor to the White House as well as Trump’s Florida properties, according to the partisan warrior named sources.
One person said, “Trump always has Pulte with him and is always saying that we have to hurry up in order to accomplish things.” Pulte is expected to keep his role as the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s head. However, he has no prior experience with intelligence, national security or the military. He will be in charge of some of the most powerful and sophisticated intelligence agencies around the world, with a wide range of surveillance tools and an international network of spies.
Former Intelligence Officers who worked in Republican and Democratic Administrations are worried that Pulte could have unlimited access to an arsenal of intelligence which they fear will be used by Pulte to target political rivals or justify a possible federal oversight over elections, as Trump requested. By choosing someone without a background in national security or intelligence, they say Trump is sending a message to those working at spy agencies that he does not value them. The White House defended Trump’s selection despite the skeptics in Congress from both parties, who cited Trump’s lack of relevant work experience and partisan record. Davis Ingle said, in a White House statement, that “the President selects the most talented and best-qualified people to serve in his cabinet.” This Administration has been able to achieve record success for the American people because of this. Bill Pulte was a good choice and will do a wonderful job for the American People. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump who helped she his 2016 campaign and was in the first administration of Trump, said on NBC News that Pulte “gets things done” and has ideas for the president. Bannon told NBC News that Pulte has a mandate to continue where Tulsi Gabard left off in her role as director of national intelligence. Her husband was diagnosed as having cancer. Bannon stated that he would focus on foreign threats to U.S. Elections, investigate the so-called Deep State, coordinate intelligence work, and offer alternatives to what the CIA is saying. Bannon stated that “he’s going after everything with an increased urgency.”
Despite the Constitution giving states the power to hold elections in certain states, Trump has because, according to him, local authorities are not trustworthy. Democrats stole the presidential election of 2020, despite claims by members of his Cabinet that there was not widespread voter fraud. Democratic lawmakers, civil rights activists and other groups were concerned that Trump’s administration could use intelligence agencies as a way to accuse foreign countries of threatening elections. This would provide a possible rationale for Federal interference. These fears were confirmed after the National Intelligence Director’s Office examined voting machines in Puerto Rico, and after Gabbard received
ballots for the 2020 Georgia election.
According to a former senior intelligence official, Pulte is likely to concentrate on the foreign threats that have been made against previous and current U.S. election results. This could be a way to question the security of voting in certain crucial states. “I bet it’s close to his top agenda,” said the former official. Pulte, who hasn’t publicly commented, has expressed online support for the White House, vice president JD Vance, and other administration officials. Pulte, who will be overseeing a network of 18 intelligence agencies, including the CIA, the National Security Agency and others, was created in the wake of 9/11 to consolidate information and improve sharing. Roger Stone, a long-time Trump ally, said that Bill Pulte would be a director of the ODNI in the same mold as Gabbard. He is committed to releasing truths and loyal to the President. Pulte made allegations of mortgage fraud against the New York Attorney General, Sen. Adam Schiff D-Calif. and former Rep. John Sipher, a retired CIA agent, said Pulte’s past “suggests he is meant to be running a detective agency” for the president by using the directorate of national intelligence. Sipher stated that someone with a political agenda, who has access to vast amounts of intelligence, could decide to selectively declassify certain documents in order to support a false narrative or conspiracy theories, while withholding information which might provide context or caveats. He said that because the intelligence community’s information is classified, they have no recourse to question or challenge their decisions. Trump, in an
, described Pulte’s as “very talent” and stated that he will accelerate the declassification intelligence. However, he didn’t elaborate. Trump
Pulte’s oversight of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other government-sponsored entities created by Congress for the support of the mortgage market. Trump said that Pulte had “deep experience in managing the most sensitive issues in America,” Trump stated online. Mark Warner, Virginia’s top Democrat in the Intelligence Committee warned that Pulte would use his position to target Trump’s enemies. This is especially true ahead of November’s midterm elections. Warner stated that Pulte could do a lot with the information he receives from intelligence agencies. “Our intelligence has always been bipartisan. Will we finally trigger the gag reflex? I hope.”
Pulte was only named acting director, and has not yet been nominated as permanent director. This would require confirmation from the Senate. Many Republicans said that Pulte would have a tough time getting proval from the Senate. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said: “I don’t see any evidence of qualifications for this job.” Bill Cassidy of Louisiana told NBC News that Pulte did not seem qualified. Pulte, as a newcomer to the national-security realm, could make it difficult for some members of Congress to support the law renewal. Tillis, speaking to NBC News, said that this nomination was made at the worst possible time. Tillis is particularly concerned about the reauthorization Section 702 which allows spy agencies collect overseas electronic communication without warrants. This surveillance tool allows intelligence services to intercept communications between U.S. citizens and foreign targets. U.S. officials claim that the authority they have is vital to prevent terrorist acts and track foreign enemies. Civil liberties activists say that it violates the privacy rights.
BBC News World
Trump is unsure if the ‘anti weaponsization’ fund has really died: “I’d need to ask lawyers”
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump created new uncertainty about the status and the future of the $1.8 billion anti weonization fund. This comes a day after Todd Blanche, acting attorney general, said that the Justice Department will no longer pursue this fund, which has caused bipartisan blowback. Subscribe to read the story without ads
Receive unlimited access to adfree articles and exclusive material. When asked in the Oval Office if the fund had been killed or was just on hold, Trump replied: “I would have to ask the attorneys.” I don’t have any idea.
He told reporters that the weonization fund was, in his opinion, a wonderful thing. I love it. The Trump administration announced Monday it would go ahead with the
, after a federal court temporarily blocked it. In a Monday statement, the Justice Department stated that it was “strongly disagreeing with the Court’s decision” but that it would “abide by its ruling”. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche during a House propriations Committee hearing in Washington Tuesday. Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Democrats and Republicans both
The fund was created to compensate Trump’s allies who had been “victims” of lawfare. Before Trump’s remarks on Wednesday, several Democratic members of Congress warned that legislation was needed to permanently close the fund. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said, “We’re not taking Blanche’s words for it.” back off creating the fund “Congress should kill this corrupt anti-weonization slushfund so that every Republican can be on record.”
BBC News World
No people – just sheep! The job Chinese college graduates were clamoring for this season
BEIJING, China — This season, one of the most competitive jobs in China was not located in an urban high rise, but rather in the vast grasslands in northern China. Subscribe to this story to enjoy it ad free
Receive unlimited access to exclusive content and ad-free articles.
A viral advertisement in ril for a job that offered couples a combined monthly salary above the average of 16,000 Yuan ($2,400), free food, lodging and Wi-Fi. It quickly attracted millions of views, and hundreds of plications, from young people who wanted to esce city life. One hashtag related to the job advertisement gathered an astounding 59 million views on Chinese social media platform Weibo. One Weibo user said, “Dealing sheep is easier than dealing people!” Another said, “It’s my dream job because I can live a simpler life away from pretentious city people.” Around 10% of the plicants had university degrees. Zuo, in an interview with NBC News, said that “most plicants are farmers and factory workers from major Chinese cities.” For
Subscribers
Why Chinese people prefer pets to parenthood
02 :18
Zuo’s job as a shepherd is gaining popularity amid a 16.3% urban
and fierce competition for jobs, with tens of millions of students graduating from Chinese universities in this year. According to Liepin, a leading Chinese recruitment platform, according to Liepin’s analysis of the job market, master’s degree holders are less likely to find jobs. The share of postings has dropped from 20,3% down to 17,4%. Over the same period, jobs targeted at graduates of vocational schools increased from 8.5% to 11 %. In southern China, a university launched a barbecue school last year to train grilling specialists for the growing night food industry. Only 30 students were accepted out of more than 4,000 plicants, an acceptance rate that is comparable with some of China’s elite university programs. Stuart Gietel Basten is a professor of public policy and social science at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He said there was a mismatch of skills, expectations and the available opportunities. Gietel-Basten says that young graduates fantasize about moving into Inner Mongolia and becoming a shepherd if they can’t find a job in Shenzhen. The work of a shepherd may seem idyllic but it’s not. It involves herding and feeding 3,000 sheep on motorbikes or horses, while interacting with few people. Zuo said that he was particularly impressed with one candidate: a recent college graduate in his 20s who came from southern China and insisted on being able to do the job. “I told him if you worked here, there would be no one around — not even women. He said, “You will not be able to even find a girlfriend.” The young man was not deterred. Zuo: “He said he was going to get a job first and earn money,” Zuo replied. I feel that young people today aren’t very eager to marry. The mindset of young people has changed. Gietel Basten stated that marriage and childbirth are not possible for many young people on mainland China after graduation. “They want to begin their life, but the uncertainty and risk of it is too much for them.” Zuo finally hired a shepherding couple, paying them about 200,000 yuan per year. Zuo claimed that two people can work well together and keep each other entertained. Many people are realizing the harsh realities behind the dream job that some saw in the Chinese social media.
One Weibo member said, “I’m not sure I can count that many sheep correctly!” It is a very exhausting job! Another person said, “It’s not really a vacation at all but hard work.” For a generation who often feel trped by the city’s relentless rat race, isolated grasslands can offer something that the city cannot. Zuo explained that “there are no arguments here, and no deception. There is no complex workplace relationship like there is in big companies.” “Only sheep and cattle.”
BBC News World
California governor candidates address supporters
California Visit For Zach
BBC News World
Elon Musk will become the first billionaire on Earth. Democrats are taking aim.
Progressive politicians are sharpening their attacks against tech tycoon Elon Musk, zeroing in on his soon-to-be-trillionaire status days before his company SpaceX’s record-setting initial public offering. Subscribe to read the story without ads
Receive unlimited access to adfree articles and exclusive contents. Musk, the richest person on the planet, will become the first billionaire in the United States when his rocket company starts selling shares to the general public next Friday, the 12th of June. Musk, who has been the target of intense criticism by Democrats for his tenure as a member of the Trump administration in
, is now a more prominent target among politicians looking to highlight America’s wealth g before the midterm elections. Darrell West, senior fellow of the Brookings Institution and researcher on the topic, wrote in an email that “Income inequality in America is a major problem.” The issue will arise in 2026-2028. Scientists say it is so big and surreal, that humans find it difficult to grasp
.
chain saw-wielding is no longer about “millionaires and trillionaires” – a catchphrase used by progressives
, but it is about the number
. The latest addition to the political lexicon has been spreading ridly online and in the campaign trail. to put into context “Nobody shouldn’t be a billionaire.” Rep. Pramila J. Jayal (D-Wash.) said in
, “Tax those damn rich.” Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in January 2010 that Musk was “going to be even richer within the next few weeks, I believe” and that his wealth was “insane”. Mallory McMorrow of Michigan, who is running as a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in the primary, said at a 11001010 that Musk was “going to get even richer, I think, in the next couple of weeks” and that it was “insanity” for him to have so much wealth. Elon Musk wants to become a billionaire. She said the subject is a great way to start a conversation about other issues, like gas prices, health care cuts and government contracts that helped SpaceX succeed. She said that Elon Musk would not have been as successful without the billions of dollars in government contracts and subsidies. She stated that one trillion dollars would be enough to cover the costs of running Michigan for 12 years, including all healthcare, infrastructure, schools and schooling, as well as all state-funded projects. (The state’s budget is rising inequality). The online anger over Musk’s potential trillionaire status is building since months. A group of abortion-rights activists in Europe received 354,000 Instagram likes last year after Musk got a huge new compensation deal with Tesla. The money was estimated to be worth $1 trillion. Billie Eilish was among those who shared the post, and she for many years, among other insults. Eilish’s “not the sharpest tools in the shed” was the insult that Musk used to describe Eilish. At a January 2010 event in Washington, D.C., Sanders raised the issue of Musk being a trillionaire. People booed. Musk, CEO SpaceX and Tesla did not reply to a question for comment. He defended his wealth by saying that he intends to use it for a settlement of humans on Mars, rather than himself. Musk would not get his stock bonus until there is a 1 million-person city on Mars. Musk said at the International Astronautical Congress held in Guadalajara in Mexico in
, “I don’t really have any other reason for personally accumulating wealth except to be able make the largest contribution to making life multiplanetary.” The audience plauded this pledge. Musk has defended his tax payments. In 2021 he claimed to have paid said recently on X tax that year. He hasn’t revealed his tax bills from other years. In 2018, he did not pay federal income taxes.
, which claimed to have obtained IRS data about wealthy Americans, said that he had paid no federal income tax in 2018. Musk has not commented on the figure for 2018. Federal taxes only ply to income. They do not ply to net worth. It’s not only Musk critics that are talking about Musk’s next major wealth milestone. Musk’s fans are also growing more excited. Musk is the owner of X. Some of his fans are at a rally in Maine to see if it hpens or interpret it as validation for his business philosophy. Gunther Eagleman is a MAGA Influencer account with 1.7 million followers.
: “The man’s absolutely unstoppable,” the account says. “Tesla and SpaceX are gold, as is xAI, Starlink and everything else he touches.” candidate forum It’s a sudden change to talk about trillionaires. In a decade, there were no billionaires in the world. Amazon founder
crossed that threshold in November 2017. John D. Rockefeller is the only person who has ever had a net worth of $1 trillion. However, in the context of his time, he was probably the closest. In 1915, John D. Rockefeller’s wealth was about one-thirtieth the U.S. GDP, similar to that of a current trillionaire. Although it’s unclear how many Americans know that Musk is close to reaching trillionaire status, or what they will do if he does, public polling indicates a skepticism towards extreme wealth. In a January 2001010 poll of American adults, 80% said that the wealth g was a problem. Meanwhile 59% thought that the federal government needed to do more to narrow the g. West of the Brookings Institution said that there is a growing backlash from the public against wealthy individuals who pay low rates of income tax for their level of wealth. Some progressive strategists believe that Musk’s status as a trillionaire could be a political gift for the middle class, since it shows the contrast between their financial struggles and Musk’s. Mark Longabaugh is a progressive media strategist and veteran of Sanders 2016 presidential campaign. He said that there are already many ads criticizing the billionaire class, and his trillionaire status would bring this to the forefront. He said Musk is a symbol for how wealthy people live their lives in the minds of some voters, replacing past villains such as the Koch Brothers, who were the
2016 of Sanders. Randi Weingarten of American Federation of Teachers criticized “billionaires or billionaires”
. She said in a statement to NBC News that Musk’s wealth is a political hot topic to discuss because “most people cannot afford to buy a house and are just one illness away” from bankruptcy. Based on University of Richmond research, a $81 billion found that people struggled to understand how 1,000,000, 1 BILLION and 1 TRILLION relate to each other. About 35% people placed the numbers “roughly equal” art when asked to put them on a line. This is incorrect. The authors suggested that it would be more clear to write a large number, like $1 trillion, as $1,000 billion. “These numbers are outside of human experience, so humans do not have a reference point.”
Nora Newcombe is a psychology professor from Temple University. She said that Elon Musk probably has no clue what this means because it’s outside of human experience. Musk would be richer than most corporations, except for Walmart whose market citalization is $910 billion. His personal networth of $1 trillion is equal to Pennsylvania’s gross domestic product. It is also equivalent to the wealth of one million millionaires. Musk’s $1 trillion is a significant milestone in the wealth debate. California voters could be asked to vote on that could one day this fall, echoing similar proposals introduced by Congress. Some billionaires have responded by threatening to impose with a post declaring (wrongly) or pouring money into called Musk a coward,, which could be in conflict with the wealth taxes. Musk, who is a Texas resident, would not be subject to California’s proposed billionaire tax. However, his probable trillionaire status may still galvanize the debate about the ballot measure. Musk responded As someone who’s not a billionaire, millionaire, or trillionaire, Quiana Hall said, “That is mind-blowing for me.” SEIU-UHW is the union backing the California billionaire taxes. She said that revenue from the tax would help health clinics survive in the face other government cuts. “There’s much to give out of that trillion,” said she. Musk is still mostly unpopular. In a
, 46% of respondents had negative views about Musk while 30% had positive views. labor rally in New York I think he is a perfect villain. Rebecca Pearcey was a Democratic Strategist who worked for Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s presidential 2020 campaign. She warned that there is a danger in a message aimed solely at taxing the rich. “It is not that Elon Musk has all of this money. She said, “How can we take his money? It’s not ‘How can you ensure everyone plays by the same rules’. a No Kings rally
BBC News World
Acting Attorney General Blanche testifies at House hearing
Act Please The The
-
LifestyleNews2 weeks agoWhat Your Lifestyle Says About You: Psychology, Habits, and Personality Explained
-
Video2 weeks agoNadal tells Amanpour about extreme solution to 19-year injury
-
LifestyleNews2 weeks agoSpine surgeon rates sofas for your back: Beanbags score 0, lumbar support gets 10
-
BBC News World2 weeks ago
Ken Martin’s DNC Chair is under increasing pressure as questions are raised about his handling of the 2024 autopsy. Subscribe to this story to enjoy it without ads
-
Video2 weeks agoWhat we don't know about Colbert's last 'Late Show'
-
Tech2 weeks agoToday's NYT Connections Hints, Answers and Help for May 25, #1079
-
Video2 weeks ago911 call reveals more about Kyle Busch’s condition before his sudden death
-
Video2 weeks agoThe Odds: Are Americans concerned about AI replacing jobs?
