Sports
Are World Cup hydration breaks actually commercial breaks or momentum breaks?

For this World Cup, FIFA has introduced mandatory hydration breaks — around the 22nd minute mark of the first half and 67th minute of the second — to counter the weather conditions across Mexico, Canada and the United States this summer.
But while the breaks are essential for player welfare when it’s hot, they are happening regardless of the temperature, leading to plenty of criticism about the impact on the game. Furthermore, the breaks have essentially split the game into four quarters similar to the NBA or NFL — which is handy given that the majority of sports fans from the home nations consume their sports in that manner — while it also allows FIFA to cash in on some lucrative advertising revenue for three minutes midway through each half.
Like them or loathe them, our reporters looked at a number of different ways in which hydration breaks are making an impact on this World Cup.
Jump to: A commercial cash injection? | A momentum killer?
Essential for player welfare?
The World Cup hydration breaks were first announced by FIFA last December, with the severe heat experienced by teams and players in the U.S. during last summer’s FIFA Club World Cup prompting the game’s governing body to introduce a formal structure for drinks breaks.
FIFA wanted a “streamlined and simplified” version of the more ad-hoc hydration breaks at previous tournaments and, despite this World Cup being played in some stadiums with air conditioning and roofs, a decision was made to introduce three-minute stoppages each half in every game
“For every game, no matter where the games are played, no matter if there’s a roof, or temperature-wise, there will be a three-minute hydration break,” Manolo Zubiria, chief tournament officer of the World Cup, said last December. “It will be three minutes from whistle to whistle in both halves. Obviously, if there’s an injury [stoppage] at the moment of the 20th or 21st minute and it’s ongoing, this will be addressed on the spot with the referee.”
The decision has had its critics.
“I don’t like it; I only like it when the conditions are extreme,” USMNT boss Mauricio Pochettino said. “But when the conditions are good, it is unnecessary.”
Spain drew 0-0 with Cape Verde on Monday night, but boss Luis de la Fuente spoke about the temperatures before the game. “I look at it in terms of the health of the players,” he said. “In extreme conditions it’s the right thing, having a break to freshen up. It’s true that tomorrow with the temperatures there’ll be [inside the stadium], maybe it isn’t necessary. But we’ve all seen the temperatures in Chattanooga [Spain’s training base], the humidity. Those breaks let you get your energy back.”
And Spain midfielder Mikel Merino said: “There’ll be games where they’re necessary, and others where they’re definitely not necessary. When it’s hot, for the players and their football to be in their best version, it’s good to have a break to regain your strength to go again. But in a lot of the stadiums which are closed and where it’s not too hot, the game stops and that isn’t not good for the fans, the game slows down and it’s more predictable. It has a big impact, the coaches can adjust things and change the dynamic. We’ll have to adapt well to that.”
Of course, there is sound medical science behind the need for hydration breaks.
According to FIFPRO, the global players’ union, three games at last year’s Club World Cup should have been suspended or postponed due to the extreme heat as those fixtures exceeded the threshold of 28 degrees Celsius (82.4 degrees Fahrenheit) on the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature gauge (WBGT) — a measure of heat stress in direct sunlight, accounting for air temperature, humidity, wind speed, sun angle and cloud cover.
So far this summer, no World Cup game has been impacted by such excessive heat and FIFA amended the fixture list following the Club World Cup for more games under cover and fixtures being played at times more likely to have less punishing conditions.
But it’s still hot, so there is support for the hydration breaks.
“The new rule should be viewed primarily as a medical safety measure,” Prof. Mehmet Karabulut, M.D., Medicana Health Group, said. “Today, the game of football is much faster and requires immense physical effort; players traverse vast distances on the field and often engage in high-intensity efforts.
“Under such conditions, it’s easy to lose a lot of fluids through sweat, making it difficult to regulate body temperature, especially in warm and humid weather. An organized break to consume fluids and cool down will enable players to return to the field in optimal condition and prevent possible health risks before fatigue sets in.
“These breaks are not a complete player-safety policy on their own. Kickoff times, recovery periods, cooling areas, emergency medical protocols and acclimatization plans are also essential. Hydration breaks are one important layer in a much larger welfare system, and in the case of the World Cup in summer in North America, the medical argument is extremely strong.” — Mark Ogden
A commercial cash injection?
It is perhaps telling that Zubiria made his announcement on hydration breaks during a workshop at the World Broadcaster Meeting in Washington D.C. during the draw for the World Cup, because there has been plenty of criticism suggesting that it is the broadcasters, rather than the players, who are the real beneficiaries of the hydration breaks.
Players get a three-minute break and the coaches deliver tactical messages, but the broadcasters can — and many have — cash in with a lucrative commercial break while play is halted.
Michael Johnson, a U.S. sports industry research analyst for S&P Global, told Reuters that the three-minute hydration breaks offer real financial positives for broadcasters during the 104-game tournament, saying that the pause in play could be “extremely valuable and could potentially command Super Bowl-level prices within that 7- to probably 9-million-dollar range.”
But Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk expressed concerns that the breaks merely enable more “commercialism” to enter the game.
“Hydration breaks are a bit interesting, because I was obviously watching almost all the games up until today, and every time going to commercial is a bit … Not really that I like it,” he said. “I think for the neutral watchers on TV it’s also not great.
“If it’s really hot, obviously it would be good to put them in. But I think you have to look at it in every game, separately, in my opinion.”
Former Manchester United and England defender Gary Neville told The Overlap that the hydration breaks are a “stealth advertising break” with U.S. broadcaster Fox using the hydration break to run commercials.
But U.S.-based Spanish-language broadcaster Telemundo has chosen not to take a commercial break during the three-minute stoppage — a decision that has been mirrored by U.K.-based ITV Sport. — Mark Ogden
A matchday momentum killer?
Restarts of play are an important part of any sport. They disrupt rhythm, shift momentum and allow the other side to regroup and rejig their game plan.
The World Cup’s midhalf breaks have fundamentally changed the way teams approach games, as they can now adapt and improvise based on the new information, while they are offered a reprieve from any barrage of attacks and can be methodical about their style and intensity in each “quarter” of the game.
“It’s advantageous for the team losing momentum — that’s why I call them momentum breaks,” USWNT boss Emma Hayes told ITV. “When you’re on top, you don’t want it; when you’re losing, you do. Sometimes it’s not even coaching [during the hydration break], it’s about taking on fluid and calming players. Sometimes it can be doing nothing. But that can be considered coaching as well.”
We have seen multiple examples of this at the tournament so far and the stats show what an impact it has made. Out of the 22 goals scored in the first half of World Cup games so far, 12 have come after the first hydration break. Of the 24 second-half goals, 12 have come after the hydration break.
But it’s not just the volume of goals after these breaks, it’s the nature of them. Of the 24 goals that have come after either hydration breaks, 11 have been game-state-altering goals … meaning they put a side level or into the lead.
Australia’s smash-and-grab 2-0 win against Türkiye was a good example of this. Both of Australia’s goals came shortly after the hydration breaks in either half, even though Turkiye had the lion’s share of the possession.
Indeed, the Socceroos had one shot in the first half before the hydration break, then had three after it and scored their opening goal from the first shot after the restart.
In the 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco, the first half clearly saw a momentum shift following the break.
Brazil’s equalizing goal came just six minutes after the pause, and although the equalizer was born out of a moment of individual brilliance, Morocco couldn’t capitalize after taking the lead right before the hydration break. The Atlas Lions registered seven shots worth 0.9 xG before the pause and could muster only 0.3 xG from five shots after it.
In Japan’s 2-2 draw against Netherlands, the Samurai Blue saw their equalizing goal come after the hydration break in the second half. The team had two shots before that break, then registered five after it.
Almost all of their xG in the game was accrued in periods after the hydration breaks.
And while Germany beat Curaçao 7-1 with ease, the break offered boss Julian Nagelsmann a chance to reaffirm their tactics against a formation they weren’t expecting.
“Curacao played with a diamond today, and we adjusted how we attacked before the hydration break,” he said. “But even so, there were still two or three moments where it took a little while because, at the end of the day, you actually very rarely play against a diamond-shaped team these days. It’s practically unheard of. Very few teams do that anymore, and we needed a bit of time. The water break was actually good to simply reiterate what we had already adjusted on the board.”
In Canada’s 1-1 draw against Bosnia and Herzegovina, the impact of the hydration breaks on team rhythm was evident.
Bosnia’s opening goal was immediately followed by a break in the first half and allowed Canada to get back on top — the result was Canada’s shots going up from one to five, and their touches in the opposition box going up from four to 17 before and after the break.
The script was repeated in Scotland’s opening game, as their winning goal came three minutes after the first break. The momentum also swung in both directions for Haiti and while they conceded after the first break, all of their seven shots and 10 touches in the opposition box in the second period of play occurred after the second break.
Obviously the game state has a part to play in a sport that ebbs and flows, but the restarts have clearly been a valuable avenue to change momentum. The trend seems to be in its nascent stages but a hydration break is a chance for managers to get creative and we might soon see teams plan differently for “quarters” of games.
As France’s Didier Deschamps put it: “It’s important to be able to give these extra two opportunities to the head coach. It’s a good thing, this is a fact, but it leads us to split the game and if you’re in a strong position, following this break you have to start playing again.
“But we adapt to this, even in our prep work we’ve anticipated this, it’s not two halftimes, it’s four quarter times. This is what we’ve got, what’s been decided, so the players and the coaches adapt to this new reality. But you get to speak an extra two times.” — Yash Thakur
Sports
MLB warns players not to deface uniforms in wake of silent Pride Night protest
Major League Baseball warned players this week not to deface uniforms after several members of the San Francisco Giants openly defied their team’s Pride Night event.
The Giants held their annual celebration of the LGBTQ+ community on Friday at Oracle Park when losing pitcher Landen Roupp and relievers JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker wrote the Bible verse “Gen 9:12-16” on their caps, which featured the “SF” logo in rainbow colors.
The Book of Genesis has become a favorite citation for opponents of gay rights.
Giants reliever Sam Hentges refused to wear the rainbow Giants cap Friday.
“To be clear, this routine verbal warning not to wear the hat in future games is not disciplinary and had absolutely nothing to do with the content of the message. We respect players’ right to free expression,” an MLB statement said.
“However, writing of any kind, with any message, is prohibited per Major League Baseball’s Uniform Regulations which provides in part that, ‘[a] Player may not write, attach, affix, embroider or otherwise display nicknames or messages on apparel or playing equipment,’” the statement said.
MLB said the warning had no direct tie to the players’ actions on Pride Night.
“We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members,’” MLB said.
Some Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance and U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, were quick to defend the players.
“What does MLB think it’s doing penalizing players for their Christian faith?” Hawley said in a post on X. “They owe us some answers. Right now.”
Vance also weighed in.
“Trump won we don’t have to do this anymore,” the vice president posted on X.
Beloved Giants broadcaster Mike Krukow urged the players to understand how their actions could offend the San Francisco community.
“I think that you have the right as a player to believe and say whatever you want,” Krukow told the San Francisco Chronicle. “But you have to take a broader look at the city you’re playing in. What makes San Francisco so great is the acceptance of others — ethnicities, opinions, cultures — and that extends to the gay community.”
San Francisco has long been a hub of gay culture with about 16% of the city identifying as LGBTQ+. The team’s annual “Until There’s a Cure Day” dates back to 1994, which marked the first time a pro sports team held a benefit to fight AIDS.
Sports
How West Wilson tried to get Lindsay Hubbard, Kyle Cooke and Carl Radke fired from ‘Summer House’: report
West Wilson reportedly tried to get Lindsay Hubbard, Kyle Cooke and Carl Radke fired from “Summer House” — which allegedly led to him not being asked back for Season 11.
However, a rep for Wilson told Page Six that the accusation is “categorically false.”
The source claimed to US weekly on Tuesday that the podcaster, 31, “told producers that Lindsay shouldn’t film pregnant and being a new mom because it’s a show about singles and having fun in the summer.”
In 2024, Hubbard, 39, welcomed daughter Gemma with now-ex-boyfriend Turner Kufe.
The insider added, “Amanda [Batula] knew about that and Lindsay was pissed.”
Meanwhile, Wilson allegedly tried to make Cooke, 43, and Radke, 41, “look bad” by secretly telling producers that the reality show “would be better with him and new friends.”
Cooke, Hubbard, and Radke are part of the original “Summer House” cast, with Batula, 34, joining as Cooke’s “girlfriend” during Season 1.
The swimwear designer was then upgraded to a full-time cast member.
Wilson joined the group in Season 8.
The insider added that “his goal was to be with Amanda and then just film with his friends.”
The sports commentator not showing his personal life and “dating other women who no one knew about,” also led to his departure.
Wilson and Batula started dating shortly after the influencer separated from Cooke in January after four years of marriage.
Batula’s ex-bestie Ciara Miller, 30, also dated Wilson for several months in 2023. The former flames even shared a kiss during Season 10.
Wilson was also actively dating Meija Moreno when his relationship with Batula was exposed.
The source claimed that Hubbard and Cooke have “joked” that Wilson and Batula “are not going to last.”
But the insider told the outler that the couple is “still fully committed to each other.”
Page Six reached out to reps for Cooke, Hubbard and Radke.
However, a second source alleged that “it was a mutual decision between the network and West.”
They noted that the Complex journalist felt that his “time on the show was coming to end” going into the Season 10 reunion.
“It became even clearer that there wasn’t a long-term fit anymore,” the insider continued, insisting that Wilson is “at peace” with the outcome.
The social media personality is now focused “on his podcast and other business ventures.”
The source explained that due to Batula and Wilson’s bombshell romance, “there’s a tear in the friend group.”
Wilson and Batula came under fire during the dramatic three-part Season 10 reunion for lying about their relationship to everyone in the group.
“The cast doesn’t want to film with him,” the insider continued to Us, noting that Batula is “still friendly” with Season 8’s Jesse Solomon, 33, and her estranged husband.
As of now, the rest of the cast is not “speaking with Batula,” with the insider expressing that her future on the show is “up in the air.”
On Monday, Hubbard took to Threads to detail her grievances with Wilson.
“West has tried to threaten my career / show now 3 times and it’s quite frankly, disgusting. No other word to describe it,” she penned.
Hubbard referenced the time Wilson publicly said on his “Show Me Something” podcast that there was “no way” she could return post-baby.
Now, a week after the reunion wrapped, fans will get a look into the fallout on Tuesday, with a bonus episode.
“Summer House: The Aftermath” — which airs at 8 p.m. ET on Bravo — will feature a sit-down between Wilson and Cooke and Batula and Hubbard, among other cast members.
Sports
Wetzel: Brendan Sorsby is done with college sports. Can local judges be next?
Now that L’Affaire Sorsby is over for college athletics, and Brendan, the would-be Texas Tech quarterback, is attempting to enter the NFL supplemental draft, perhaps something positive can still come of this.
(Other than billable hours for white-shoe law firms, of course.)
Namely, college athletics needs to get local judges and their temporary injunctions out of the game.
Brendan Sorsby’s college career should have been over the moment he acknowledged he bet some 9,000 times on sports, including about 40 on Indiana while a member of the football program. These were clear violations of NCAA statutes and precedents. Banishment was the appropriate punishment.
Open. Shut.
Except along came a Texas judge, Ken Curry, who decided to buy Sorsby’s Hail Mary legal argument that he should get to play this season anyway.
Sorsby’s case centered on how he suffered from a gambling addiction and how any punishment would adversely impact his mental health. Therefore, he deserved a restraining order to keep playing until he got his day in court … which, of course, wouldn’t occur until after he exhausted his eligibility.
Curry’s decision to grant Sorsby’s injunction last week left the NCAA as the only sports governing organization on earth prohibited from enforcing anti-gambling and integrity rules.
The entire world — let alone all of college athletics — was on one side of this issue. A single judge on the other.
Yet the judge is the one who counted. In a likely tell about how illogical even he knew this was, Curry never provided a specific explanation as to what he liked about Sorsby’s argument.
In the end, it didn’t matter.
Sorsby’s victory began unraveling late last week when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton stepped in and threatened legal action against the Big 12 if it tried to punish Sorsby itself via the league’s own bylaws.
That opened the door for the Big 12 to bring in the high-powered law firm of Sidley Austin (whose past lawyers include Barack Obama and J.D. Vance). On Monday, it petitioned a federal judge for injunctive relief against Paxton and a declaratory judgement that, yes, it was allowed to enforce its long agreed upon rules.
The chances of it succeeding were considered high, which would have left Sorsby open to future suspension or other punishments. For both the player and the program, the uncertainty was too great. By Monday evening, Sorsby gave up.
All’s well that ends well, apparently, but what college sports needs to do in this moment is to seize the collective opposition here — even if some of it was plagued by grandstanding — to push the federal government to put an end (as much as possible) to governance by local courts.
The days of a conference having to ask federal judges for the right to enforce its integrity bylaws need to end.
Nor should every player, coach or school be able to win injunctions against nearly any decision they don’t happen to like.
College sports are plagued by judicial governance. Extra seasons of eligibility. Two-week temporary restraining orders. Midseason Euroleague player acquisitions. These days you don’t just need to recruit a five-star quarterback, you need a five-star judge.
The plaintiffs don’t even have to actually win their cases, they just have to convince a judge they have a case and that holding them out of competition while the process drags would cause irreparable harm.
It’s a lower bar to clear. By the time the actual case is set to be tried, the season is over and the filing is dropped. It’s a dishonest workaround that’s causing chaos.
College sports is now unable to determine who can play and for how long, or even whether it can enforce basic standards on the third-rail issues such as sports wagering.
There are currently multiple efforts in Congress designed to “save” college sports or “preserve” college sports. They are sprawling bills, complicated and filled with pet projects and straw man arguments. As such, none of them stand much of a chance.
As the battle for sweeping reform churns on, college sports needs to push for a so-called skinny bill designed to address the items that almost everyone agrees on: mainly eligibility and enforcement free from judicial interference.
Until that is handled, this is a rudderless ship constantly trying to navigate a parade of storms.
Drafting such common-sense legislation might not be foolproof, but it is critical to try. It would receive widespread, if not unanimous, support inside college athletics and arrive on the floor for a vote not just bipartisan but nonpartisan.
College sports’ issues are myriad. There’s a lot to sort out.
Sidelining the Judge Ken Currys of the world should be step one.
Sports
Alex Pereira demands punishment for ‘coward’ referee in Ciryl Gane fight: ‘He is not a man’
Alex Pereira fell short in a seemingly impossible conquest to become UFC’s first three-division champion. A second-round TKO loss to Ciryl Gane at UFC Freedom 250 crushed those hopes, but the path there has Pereira irate. “Poatan” condemned potential illegal strikes from Gane that preceded the finish, with much of his anger directed towards referee Herb Dean.
Gane stopped Pereira early in Round 2 after a stiff jab dropped the former middleweight and light heavyweight champion. From there, Gane unleashed ground strikes — several of which appeared to strike the back of the head — before finishing him on the feet. Pereira bemoaned Gane aggressively pursuing the finish at the expense of fair play.
“It was a lucky jab,” Pereira said in a YouTube video, though he took no issue with the strike that dropped him. “He took advantage and started landing heavier shots.”
“He’s desperate. He threw a shot he didn’t even believe in, and he wanted to finish the fight whatever way. He always does that. In multiple fights, if you look at his highlights, that’s what you’ll see all the time.”
Gane has developed a reputation as a dirty fighter among the MMA fanbase. He rejected that label in a pre-fight interview with CBS Sports, but his complicated legacy took another hit on Sunday. Pereira came into the fight conscious of illegal strikes headed his way. Even Sean O’Malley said on Sunday that he was in the training room with Pereira when he was discussing potential illegal strikes from Gane.
“You know what’s funny, in the rules meeting when Pereira was talking to the ref,” O’Malley said. “They were having the translator go over back of the head.”
Pereira, the former two-division champion, had some sympathy for eye pokes and groin strikes, things that can happen by accident in a dynamic exchange. However, he sees no way to forgive strikes to the back of the head.
“I was getting up, and it became difficult to recover,” Pereira said. “I believe if it wasn’t for those shots, I’d be in that situation and could’ve possibly recovered. Maybe not, but those shots were very hard and illegal.”
“A punch to the back of the head — you’re right there, man. You have to be seeing it,” he mentioned earlier in the video. “That was the opportunity of a lifetime for him, and the referee was right there to see it.”
The Unified Rules of MMA ban strikes to the back of the head and spine. The illegal target zone is defined as “the area starting at the crown of the head and running directly down the centerline of the head with a one-inch variance to each side.”
Pereira claims he approached Dean with his concerns before the fight. Plino Cruz, Pereira’s coach, served as an interpreter between Pereira and Dean.
“The referee who was working my fight called his colleague over, another referee,” Pereira said. “He used him as an example to explain where the back of the head is, where you can hit, and where you can’t.”
Pereira was incredibly frustrated with Dean’s officiating. Often revered for his stoicism, Pereira had a scathing assessment of Dean’s character.
“A guy like that, he goes out, drinks his beer or drinks his seltzer water, or whatever. He gets together with his friends. If he has kids or a nephew, I think that, no, I’m certain, that they look at that ref and say, ‘He’s a coward.’ But they’re his friends, they won’t say that to him. But they think it, ‘He’s a coward.’ Because he was a coward,” Pereira said.
Pereira believes Dean failed to keep the fight clean and the fighters safe. He called for Dean to be punished or face legal action for his failure to do his job well.
“He is not a man. He shouldn’t have been refereeing that fight,” Pereira said. “To be honest, a guy like that should be punished. It’s a very serious job and a very serious event. What happened? The ref should’ve faced legal consequences for that.”
Commission accountability is an issue that’s plagued MMA for as long as it’s been regulated. Results are rarely overturned, while judges and referees are seldom punished for poor calls or made available for comment. After his loss at UFC Freedom 250, Pereira called for fighters to unite and make referees liable.
“This will only change when fighters come together to push out referees who continue making mistakes like this,” Pereira said. ” Let’s make sure this doesn’t happen to you. We have the power to make it happen!”
Sports
Google launches Android 17, rolling out now to Pixel
Following four betas, Google is ready to launch Android 17 for Pixel devices. There are a handful of big additions and changes, while today’s release coincides with the June 2026 Pixel (Feature) Drop.
Like last year, this update is arriving before the historic fall window as part of Google’s new release cadence. The biggest user-facing addition in Android 17 is the ability to Bubble any application. A similar capability was previously reserved for message conversations. Long-press any app on your homescreen and tap the new button in the top-left corner to get a chat head-style icon that you can move around and drag down to close. A Bubble Bar in the bottom-right corner is available for large screen devices.
Handy for travel, entertainment and work, Bubbles lets you easily reference notes or maps, watch tutorials and even check sports. It keeps everything you need in reach but out of the way.
A small but nice addition in Wallpaper & style > Icons > Names is “Show app names” to hide labels on your homescreen.
Android 17 implements app memory limits “to ensure apps never use too much RAM” for improved device performance and to help preserve battery.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The screen recorder accessed from Quick Settings has been redesigned with a floating pill interface. Your available options are unchanged from before. After the recording has started, you can tap the status bar indicator to bring back the pill and make changes — tap the settings gear — or “Stop.” Screen Reactions give you a green screen to add a selfie video to the capture.
Afterwards, you’re taken to a new fullscreen page that lets you preview the clip, Edit, Delete, or Share.
In Quick Settings, the Camera, Location, and Microphone access indicators in the top-right corner have been redesigned. The pill is narrower and makes use of circular containers to better distinguish what’s active.
On the topic of Location, Android 17 has a number of changes. The runtime Location permission now adds explicit checkboxes when picking between “Precise” and “Approximate.” Google is also adding a new one-time precise location button for apps, while there’s an improved algorithm for approximate location.
Additionally, you can share specific contacts with apps “instead of your entire address book.”
The bigger QS change is split Wi-Fi and Mobile data toggles. After updating, the previous Internet Tile becomes Wi-Fi and you can add Mobile data. On supported devices, there’s also a new “Satellite” Tile that takes you to “Satellite connectivity” settings.
When you “Mark as lost,” Find Hub now lets you require biometrics, “so even if a thief has your passcode, they can’t access information on your phone or turn off tracking.”
The “No notifications” message in the shade has been replaced by “You’re all caught up” and a trophy icon that comes from the Pixel Watch.
In terms of visual changes, Widget panes now feature a blurred background just like Quick Settings and the Notification shade. There are various icon tweaks, but nothing drastic following the Material 3 Expressive redesign last year. You’ll also notice a close ‘x’ in fingerprint sheets.
There are several notable changes in the Settings app:
“Accounts and backup” is a new combined menu that simplifies “Password & passkeys.”
Once you dig down, individual preferences are now housed in shorter cards that remove top/bottom padding for more compact lists.
In Sound & vibration, you’ll find a new slider for “Assistant volume.”
Under Display & touch > Dark theme, you can now control which apps use the Expanded dark theme.
There’s a new Easter egg for the first time in three generations. Go to Settings > About phone > Android version and tap the “17” repeatedly to connect all the dots.
Android 17 Pixel launch
Android 17 is launching and rolling out starting today for the Pixel 6, Pixel 6 Pro, Pixel 6a, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel 7a, Pixel Tablet, Pixel Fold, Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro, Pixel 8a, Pixel 9, Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro XL, Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Pixel 9a, Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and Pixel 10a.
Visit Settings > System > System update and click the “Check for update” button if the OTA hasn’t already appeared on your device. Android 17 Beta 4.1 users will get a small update to this final release.
-
Business3 days ago
How much of Musk’s wealth comes from government help? Virtually all of it
-
LifestyleNews2 weeks ago
120 minutes of strength training per week may help extend lifespan
-
Politics5 days ago
What to know about the stabbing that set off fiery riots in Northern Ireland
-
Video4 days ago
Download fans say what they love about the festival. #DownloadFestival #BBCNews
-
Video4 days ago
Why SpaceX IPO isn't about space. #SpaceX #ElonMusk #BBCNews
-
HealthNews5 days ago
The people of Okinawa, Japan only eat until they are about 80 percent full, then stop — and the practice has been linked in multiple peer-reviewed studies to lower rates of cardiovascular disease, slo
-
TravelNews4 days ago
My Paternal Instinct Should’ve Warned Me About Netflix’s Maternal Instinct
-
Food4 days ago
Pope Leo’s plane was grounded. Then the King of Spain stepped in to help